Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Waiteti Trout Stream Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Waiteti Trout Stream Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
119 Valid Reviews
The Waiteti Trout Stream Holiday Park experience has a total of 121 reviews. There are 119 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 119 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 64 |
|
54% |
| 9/10 | 28 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 14 |
|
12% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
88.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waiteti Trout Stream Holiday Park valid reviews is 88.57% and is based on 119 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
17 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 119 valid reviews, the experience has 17 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 17 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
35% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
35% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waiteti Trout Stream Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 17 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
81.78%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan | 1/10 | 691 days | 46% |
| Naomi | 8/10 | 783 days | 100% |
| Greg | 10/10 | 905 days | 84% |
| Liz Wade | 8/10 | 1755 days | 8% |
| Camilla | 10/10 | 1787 days | 8% |
| Orla | 8/10 | 1818 days | 8% |
| Javier Williams | 7/10 | 1818 days | 7% |
| D&R | 10/10 | 1909 days | 8% |
| Mark Jarvis | 9/10 | 1909 days | 7% |
| asomek | 9/10 | 2062 days | 7% |
| TP&MM | 9/10 | 2093 days | 7% |
| Rocket | 9/10 | 2093 days | 7% |
| Dlg | 9/10 | 2152 days | 7% |
| Camping-Dave | 6/10 | 2244 days | 6% |
| Brett Donald | 10/10 | 2508 days | 6% |
| Andy Sheard | 9/10 | 2514 days | 6% |
| Jan Vos | 10/10 | 2562 days | 6% |
| Anna Song | 1/10 | 2791 days | 2% |
| Elaine Yuill | 9/10 | 2839 days | 5% |
| Jo Norsworthy | 9/10 | 2881 days | 5% |
| Mike Guest | 10/10 | 2989 days | 4% |
| juki_ramones | 8/10 | 3003 days | 4% |
| Andrew Nelson | 8/10 | 3137 days | 4% |
| Eric Bellas | 10/10 | 3169 days | 4% |
| Katie Griffin | 8/10 | 3193 days | 4% |
| Axel Merz | 8/10 | 3235 days | 3% |
| Mark George | 10/10 | 3245 days | 3% |
| Anita Liow | 9/10 | 3247 days | 3% |
| Jacci Williams | 2/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
| Sam Howard | 3/10 | 3263 days | 2% |
| Roel Boorsma | 8/10 | 3266 days | 3% |
| David From Switzerland | 9/10 | 3280 days | 3% |
| Maxim Domashev | 1/10 | 3282 days | 1% |
| Gayle Campbell | 10/10 | 3294 days | 3% |
| Jade Duncan | 8/10 | 3331 days | 3% |
| Aengus Jankowsky | 10/10 | 3339 days | 3% |
| Nurul Nadia Naziron | 10/10 | 3344 days | 3% |
| Chiara Magelli | 9/10 | 3445 days | 3% |
| Jason Robus | 7/10 | 3468 days | 3% |
| Elka Keijzer | 6/10 | 3492 days | 2% |
| Emma Keegan | 10/10 | 3522 days | 3% |
| Sabine Hargens | 10/10 | 3573 days | 2% |
| Mike Merrick | 10/10 | 3575 days | 2% |
| Sarah Farr | 10/10 | 3612 days | 2% |
| Bob Lygo | 10/10 | 3612 days | 2% |
| misstassie | 10/10 | 3612 days | 2% |
| Huia Ketcham | 10/10 | 3643 days | 2% |
| Lars Van Uffelen | 1/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
| John K | 10/10 | 3704 days | 2% |
| Teresa Erana | 10/10 | 3734 days | 2% |
| Jenny Duncan | 10/10 | 3766 days | 2% |
| John W | 10/10 | 3827 days | 2% |
| john_seasoned_traveler | 10/10 | 3827 days | 2% |
| Miro Amsalem | 9/10 | 3888 days | 1% |
| Robyn McDermott | 9/10 | 3888 days | 1% |
| Cimino Cole | 10/10 | 3888 days | 1% |
| Julie Ledanois | 8/10 | 3930 days | 1% |
| Pierre Gentile | 8/10 | 3930 days | 1% |
| Alex Sheldon | 9/10 | 3944 days | 1% |
| Stefan Reutler | 10/10 | 3944 days | 1% |
| Granste Stéphane | 10/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
| Andrew Young | 10/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
| Jenny Hall | 7/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| Janine K | 9/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| Stuart Hazelton | 10/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| Paul Lipsanos | 10/10 | 4009 days | 1% |
| dominique raccah | 9/10 | 4009 days | 1% |
| Joseph Ross | 10/10 | 4070 days | 1% |
| W & K Boyd | 10/10 | 4100 days | 1% |
| Nigel Shaw | 10/10 | 4192 days | 1% |
| Emily Sweetman | 9/10 | 4284 days | 0% |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 4284 days | 0% |
| Heather Macdonald | 10/10 | 4312 days | 0% |
| MiriamWhelan | 10/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Vullings_Family | 9/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Maurice Grice | 10/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Trason | 10/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Daniel Kwon | 10/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| David | 8/10 | 4404 days | 2% |
| Robertson | 10/10 | 4435 days | 2% |
| shaunarana | 10/10 | 4527 days | 2% |
| TravelGran | 10/10 | 4588 days | 2% |
| greena_world | 9/10 | 4588 days | 2% |
| The_Thorpes | 10/10 | 4618 days | 2% |
| TararuaSocialRiders | 10/10 | 4618 days | 2% |
| sidcupjon | 10/10 | 4649 days | 2% |
| Anglea de Smit | 9/10 | 4660 days | 1% |
| thebrems | 9/10 | 4709 days | 2% |
| TurnerClan | 10/10 | 4709 days | 2% |
| guyr | 10/10 | 4709 days | 2% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 4740 days | 2% |
| Natascha & Greg | 9/10 | 4752 days | 1% |
| Francesca_9696 | 10/10 | 4770 days | 2% |
| NandJ | 10/10 | 4770 days | 2% |
| jag10 | 10/10 | 4801 days | 2% |
| aliocha | 10/10 | 4801 days | 2% |
| c2000 | 9/10 | 4801 days | 2% |
| VCK | 10/10 | 4862 days | 2% |
| vlim003 | 10/10 | 4984 days | 2% |
| tazman | 9/10 | 4984 days | 2% |
| P Bukal | 10/10 | 4994 days | 1% |
| Noah Stegmann | 9/10 | 4995 days | 1% |
| Christoph & Maria | 10/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
| Marty Fey | 8/10 | 5006 days | 1% |
| Rolf | 7/10 | 5006 days | 1% |
| Simon Vickers | 9/10 | 5014 days | 1% |
| rodcorn | 10/10 | 5015 days | 2% |
| Marianne Astorp | 9/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
| fourboys | 10/10 | 5074 days | 2% |
| Treadways | 10/10 | 5074 days | 2% |
| Andersons | 10/10 | 5135 days | 2% |
| somethingabout | 10/10 | 5196 days | 2% |
| ksteer | 10/10 | 5227 days | 2% |
| Family_Thomsen | 8/10 | 5362 days | 1% |
| Gail Mckinstry | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| Elisabeth Egerup | 10/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| BeanzoNZ | 1/10 | 5439 days | 1% |
| selinab | 10/10 | 5463 days | 1% |
| David Gildea | 10/10 | 5500 days | 2% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Waiteti Trout Stream Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Waiteti Trout Stream Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Waiteti Trout Stream Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
3.68% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.