Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks
Valid Reviews
63 Valid Reviews
The Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 64 reviews. There are 63 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 63 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
87.26% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.26% and is based on 62 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
38 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 63 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 88.42% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
80.28%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Mcmeeking | 10/10 | 9 days | 100% |
| Rebekah Scarlett | 2/10 | 37 days | 45% |
| Quetzacol | 10/10 | 160 days | 99% |
| Paul T Beisser III | 9/10 | 160 days | 98% |
| Samuel Dällenbach | 5/10 | 739 days | 52% |
| Elizabeth Keller | 8/10 | 1074 days | 36% |
| Silke | 10/10 | 1074 days | 37% |
| Suzz | 8/10 | 1348 days | 17% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 1894 days | 4% |
| Fer&And | 10/10 | 2778 days | 3% |
| Ryan | 10/10 | 2809 days | 3% |
| Kristina Russo | 9/10 | 3272 days | 2% |
| Jonzie NZ | 8/10 | 3447 days | 1% |
| Elaine Carter | 10/10 | 3636 days | 1% |
| Ann-Catherine Deblon | 8/10 | 3657 days | 1% |
| Brandy Brooks | 10/10 | 3725 days | 1% |
| Louise Tulp | 10/10 | 3791 days | 1% |
| Andrew Cruickshank | 9/10 | 3996 days | 0% |
| Oliver Powles | 8/10 | 4125 days | 0% |
| Ted Cole | 9/10 | 4392 days | 1% |
| Neil & Christine | 10/10 | 4785 days | 1% |
| Andrew Wemmer | 8/10 | 4845 days | 1% |
| Joan and Colin Price | 9/10 | 4848 days | 1% |
| Brigitte van Leeuwen-ud Meys | 8/10 | 4863 days | 1% |
| wfouracre | 10/10 | 4908 days | 1% |
| Goran Backlund | 10/10 | 5107 days | 1% |
| Helmut Schmid | 10/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
| D van Dongen | 9/10 | 5126 days | 1% |
| Richard Harvey | 9/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
| Lotte Zwail | 8/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
| R E Webb | 9/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
| Walter & Heidi Baumann | 8/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
| Petra | 10/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
| J Knol | 8/10 | 5177 days | 1% |
| Tuibaby22 | 1/10 | 5182 days | 0% |
| Bernhard & Brigitte Gosch | 8/10 | 5220 days | 1% |
| Chantal Wendel | 9/10 | 5468 days | 1% |
| Margaret Lally | 8/10 | 5470 days | 1% |
| Michael Orme | 9/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
| Kees Stigter | 9/10 | 5484 days | 1% |
| TraceyE | 10/10 | 5488 days | 1% |
| Annie Pennington | 10/10 | 5503 days | 1% |
| Sarah Ewing | 10/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
| De Blaeij | 8/10 | 5514 days | 1% |
| Grant | 10/10 | 5774 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 5780 days | 1% |
| Michele Prevost | 8/10 | 5848 days | 1% |
| Rik | 9/10 | 5854 days | 1% |
| Mark and Natasha UK | 9/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Faller | 10/10 | 5876 days | 1% |
| barts | 8/10 | 5927 days | 1% |
| stephenst | 9/10 | 5927 days | 1% |
| mvano | 8/10 | 5937 days | 1% |
| Hans Barth | 9/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| marleen451 | 9/10 | 5973 days | 1% |
| Tracy & Peter Cassidy | 8/10 | 5982 days | 1% |
| Evan | 10/10 | 6004 days | 1% |
| wanganuilover | 10/10 | 6187 days | 1% |
| rosil | 10/10 | 6187 days | 1% |
| Martina Bumiller | 10/10 | 6192 days | 1% |
| Brigette Guikens | 10/10 | 6208 days | 1% |
| ZimmermannA | 10/10 | 6228 days | 1% |
| Mike | 3/10 | 6232 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.02% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 56 days. However the Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Papamoa Beach Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 1 day. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 0 | -0.00% |
| 1 | -0.02% |
| 2 | -0.04% |
| 3 | -0.06% |
| 4 | -0.08% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
3.03% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.