Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Coromandel Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Coromandel Tasman Holiday Parks
Valid Reviews
34 Valid Reviews
The Coromandel Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 34 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 34 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
41% |
| 8/10 | 7 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
6% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.53% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Coromandel Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 83.53% and is based on 34 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
14 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 34 valid reviews, the experience has 14 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 14 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 1 |
|
7% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
43% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
7% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Coromandel Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 81.43% and is based on 14 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
95.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jen | 10/10 | 429 days | 100% |
| Brenda | 10/10 | 641 days | 86% |
| Laura Jarry | 10/10 | 764 days | 75% |
| Big Fat Paulie | 9/10 | 825 days | 68% |
| Shirley Simmonds | 9/10 | 1433 days | 15% |
| Linda | 8/10 | 1586 days | 9% |
| Dom | 9/10 | 1737 days | 6% |
| Charlotte Lobb | 9/10 | 1799 days | 6% |
| Margie | 9/10 | 2043 days | 5% |
| Deb S | 9/10 | 2225 days | 5% |
| Shira LA | 9/10 | 2498 days | 4% |
| Stacey Maynard | 10/10 | 2638 days | 4% |
| Paul Smith | 4/10 | 2826 days | 2% |
| Lauren Burdett | 8/10 | 2923 days | 3% |
| Yanick Desautels | 7/10 | 3464 days | 2% |
| holidaymad from Solihull | 8/10 | 3562 days | 2% |
| Atilio | 6/10 | 3593 days | 1% |
| Garry Renton | 8/10 | 3876 days | 1% |
| Herman Schulz | 9/10 | 3902 days | 1% |
| Aurora Garcia | 8/10 | 3949 days | 1% |
| Moorman | 7/10 | 4346 days | 0% |
| Marian | 7/10 | 4357 days | 0% |
| Kevin Blom | 4/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
| Henzen | 8/10 | 4364 days | 0% |
| Stevie | 9/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
| Stefan Roth | 9/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
| Megan Child | 9/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
| Hanna_Malte | 7/10 | 4630 days | 1% |
| Stig Domander | 8/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
| Dave van Bergen | 9/10 | 4960 days | 1% |
| lyndavid | 9/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
| Lorena | 10/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
| Susanne Santer | 9/10 | 5459 days | 1% |
| Hansjoerg Ehrmann | 10/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Coromandel Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.89% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Coromandel Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Coromandel Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.84% |
| 198 | -3.86% |
| 199 | -3.87% |
| 200 | -3.89% |
| 201 | -3.91% |
| 202 | -3.93% |
| 203 | -3.95% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.78% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.