Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Matakohe Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Matakohe Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
44 Valid Reviews
The Matakohe Holiday Park experience has a total of 44 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
48% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.23% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Matakohe Holiday Park valid reviews is 90.23% and is based on 44 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
14 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 44 valid reviews, the experience has 14 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 14 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 3 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 2 |
|
14% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
43% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
21% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Matakohe Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 83.57% and is based on 14 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
96.52%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mark | 9/10 | 300 days | 100% |
| Panthax | 10/10 | 360 days | 99% |
| Christine | 9/10 | 391 days | 96% |
| Christa | 10/10 | 605 days | 84% |
| Elke | 10/10 | 635 days | 82% |
| Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 666 days | 79% |
| Andy G | 10/10 | 725 days | 74% |
| Wendy Brooks | 10/10 | 1090 days | 38% |
| Ray Malone | 10/10 | 1396 days | 16% |
| Blox1340 | 10/10 | 1761 days | 5% |
| Nathan | 10/10 | 1821 days | 5% |
| Familie mit Baby | 10/10 | 1913 days | 4% |
| J and D | 10/10 | 2155 days | 4% |
| Shira LA | 7/10 | 2551 days | 3% |
| Laurentius Bijsmans | 6/10 | 2829 days | 2% |
| Cindy Lewis | 10/10 | 3008 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 8/10 | 3157 days | 2% |
| Jude and Chris | 10/10 | 3168 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 10/10 | 3191 days | 2% |
| Ulrich Rix | 8/10 | 3222 days | 2% |
| Nick Coulson | 10/10 | 3243 days | 2% |
| Michael Baertschi | 10/10 | 3273 days | 1% |
| Rainer Welsch | 10/10 | 3282 days | 1% |
| Hana Rachfalik | 10/10 | 3300 days | 1% |
| John Chilcote | 9/10 | 3515 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 9/10 | 3526 days | 1% |
| Gianpiero Rodari | 9/10 | 3708 days | 1% |
| Andrew Young | 9/10 | 3981 days | 0% |
| sueadegizmo | 8/10 | 4591 days | 0% |
| Richard Harvey | 8/10 | 4692 days | 0% |
| Erik Folkersen | 7/10 | 4788 days | 0% |
| Fran & Roger | 10/10 | 4791 days | 0% |
| Verhahr | 7/10 | 4794 days | 0% |
| Alan Jeffery | 10/10 | 5045 days | 0% |
| Faucon | 8/10 | 5064 days | 0% |
| alanddon | 9/10 | 5108 days | 0% |
| Tony Masters | 8/10 | 5402 days | 0% |
| Jannievan Osnabrugge | 8/10 | 5424 days | 0% |
| Robertson | 10/10 | 5424 days | 0% |
| Brenda | 9/10 | 5439 days | 0% |
| mariekef | 8/10 | 5488 days | 0% |
| parker1 | 7/10 | 5488 days | 0% |
| neeltjec | 9/10 | 5748 days | 0% |
| MargaretH | 8/10 | 5791 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Matakohe Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.02% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Matakohe Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Matakohe Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.96% |
| 198 | -3.98% |
| 199 | -4.00% |
| 200 | -4.02% |
| 201 | -4.04% |
| 202 | -4.06% |
| 203 | -4.08% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.69% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.