G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mueller Hut Route.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Mueller Hut Route
Valid Reviews
74 Valid Reviews
The Mueller Hut Route experience has a total of 74 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 74 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 38 |
|
51% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
12% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.81% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mueller Hut Route valid reviews is 90.81% and is based on 74 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
72 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 74 valid reviews, the experience has 72 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 36 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.56% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mueller Hut Route face-to-face reviews is 90.56% and is based on 72 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
92.28%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Therese Kacsics | 10/10 | 2540 days | 100% |
| Tomas Kotul | 9/10 | 2980 days | 71% |
| Madi | 10/10 | 3043 days | 68% |
| Kosia | 10/10 | 3043 days | 68% |
| Petr Jesko | 10/10 | 3054 days | 68% |
| Sandra Piechoua | 10/10 | 3054 days | 68% |
| Isabel | 9/10 | 3291 days | 52% |
| Jorg Muller | 10/10 | 3291 days | 53% |
| Anja Rakers | 9/10 | 3297 days | 52% |
| Mark Ryan | 10/10 | 3298 days | 52% |
| Marla | 7/10 | 3300 days | 47% |
| Matthias Hottex | 10/10 | 3303 days | 52% |
| Valerie Pauly | 7/10 | 3303 days | 47% |
| Jan Sojka | 10/10 | 3303 days | 52% |
| Denisa Tuckova | 10/10 | 3303 days | 52% |
| Daniel Weber | 7/10 | 3310 days | 47% |
| Szu-Yi Hsu | 9/10 | 3314 days | 50% |
| Chao Lai | 9/10 | 3314 days | 50% |
| Derick Trotter | 9/10 | 3315 days | 50% |
| Molly Bogeberg | 10/10 | 3318 days | 51% |
| Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3319 days | 50% |
| Lauren Goebel | 10/10 | 3324 days | 50% |
| Leon Schotter | 10/10 | 3325 days | 50% |
| Ellie Doughty | 8/10 | 3326 days | 49% |
| Lukas Havlicek | 9/10 | 3328 days | 50% |
| Regina Baum | 8/10 | 3328 days | 49% |
| Florian Baum | 10/10 | 3328 days | 50% |
| Joaquin Gruffat | 9/10 | 3330 days | 49% |
| Isaliner and Mathieu | 10/10 | 3335 days | 50% |
| Matt and Louise | 10/10 | 3378 days | 47% |
| Lenka Korinkova | 10/10 | 3677 days | 28% |
| Jiri Benda | 10/10 | 3677 days | 28% |
| Roeland Driessen | 10/10 | 3749 days | 24% |
| Oliver Andres | 10/10 | 3764 days | 23% |
| Douglas Yeates | 9/10 | 4021 days | 6% |
| Simeon W | 10/10 | 4037 days | 5% |
| Stina Hultberg | 10/10 | 4059 days | 4% |
| Hadar | 10/10 | 4059 days | 4% |
| Linus Larsson | 6/10 | 4061 days | 1% |
| Marius Hoffmann | 9/10 | 4072 days | 3% |
| Daniel Naveh | 10/10 | 4103 days | 1% |
| Doran Swartz | 9/10 | 4104 days | 1% |
| Guy David | 7/10 | 4104 days | 0% |
| Sapir Lifshitz | 8/10 | 4104 days | 1% |
| Maya Barad | 9/10 | 4104 days | 1% |
| Sarah Strong | 10/10 | 4107 days | 1% |
| Thomas Roche | 10/10 | 4116 days | 0% |
| Omri Ifrsh | 10/10 | 4395 days | 16% |
| Pete Wilson | 9/10 | 4406 days | 16% |
| Tim Vennewold | 9/10 | 4407 days | 16% |
| Yves Vennewald | 10/10 | 4407 days | 16% |
| Pia Pitkala | 9/10 | 4409 days | 16% |
| Arno Leleu | 8/10 | 4429 days | 15% |
| Katharina Littlemann | 10/10 | 4432 days | 16% |
| Fabian and Teresa | 8/10 | 4441 days | 15% |
| Michael Neumann | 10/10 | 4772 days | 16% |
| Nicholas Prakenhammar | 7/10 | 4798 days | 14% |
| Jasmin Loeffler | 7/10 | 5096 days | 14% |
| Ofir Avimeir | 9/10 | 5129 days | 16% |
| Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5133 days | 16% |
| Todd Pang | 10/10 | 5135 days | 16% |
| Chrissy Crebas | 10/10 | 5136 days | 16% |
| Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5154 days | 16% |
| Thomas Reidinger | 7/10 | 5165 days | 14% |
| Eduard Wikidal | 3/10 | 5166 days | 1% |
| Wallet | 8/10 | 5178 days | 15% |
| Victoria Slater | 8/10 | 5490 days | 15% |
| Franz | 10/10 | 5513 days | 16% |
| Nicky and Andy Prescott | 8/10 | 5518 days | 15% |
| Matthias A | 9/10 | 5518 days | 16% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5599 days | 16% |
| Evan | 10/10 | 5667 days | 16% |
| SteveW | 8/10 | 5868 days | 15% |
| Francesca Sabat | 10/10 | 5872 days | 16% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mueller Hut Route does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.72% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.