Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mueller Hut Route.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
75 Valid Reviews
The Mueller Hut Route experience has a total of 75 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 75 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 39 |
|
52% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
12% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.93% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mueller Hut Route valid reviews is 90.93% and is based on 75 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
72 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 75 valid reviews, the experience has 72 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 36 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.56% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mueller Hut Route face-to-face reviews is 90.56% and is based on 72 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.17%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chris | 10/10 | 1896 days | 100% |
| Therese Kacsics | 10/10 | 2879 days | 60% |
| Tomas Kotul | 9/10 | 3319 days | 42% |
| Madi | 10/10 | 3382 days | 40% |
| Kosia | 10/10 | 3382 days | 40% |
| Petr Jesko | 10/10 | 3393 days | 40% |
| Sandra Piechoua | 10/10 | 3393 days | 40% |
| Isabel | 9/10 | 3630 days | 30% |
| Jorg Muller | 10/10 | 3630 days | 30% |
| Anja Rakers | 9/10 | 3636 days | 30% |
| Mark Ryan | 10/10 | 3637 days | 30% |
| Marla | 7/10 | 3639 days | 28% |
| Matthias Hottex | 10/10 | 3642 days | 30% |
| Valerie Pauly | 7/10 | 3642 days | 28% |
| Jan Sojka | 10/10 | 3642 days | 30% |
| Denisa Tuckova | 10/10 | 3642 days | 30% |
| Daniel Weber | 7/10 | 3649 days | 27% |
| Szu-Yi Hsu | 9/10 | 3653 days | 29% |
| Chao Lai | 9/10 | 3653 days | 29% |
| Derick Trotter | 9/10 | 3654 days | 29% |
| Molly Bogeberg | 10/10 | 3657 days | 29% |
| Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3658 days | 29% |
| Lauren Goebel | 10/10 | 3663 days | 29% |
| Leon Schotter | 10/10 | 3664 days | 29% |
| Ellie Doughty | 8/10 | 3665 days | 28% |
| Lukas Havlicek | 9/10 | 3667 days | 28% |
| Regina Baum | 8/10 | 3667 days | 28% |
| Florian Baum | 10/10 | 3667 days | 29% |
| Joaquin Gruffat | 9/10 | 3669 days | 28% |
| Isaliner and Mathieu | 10/10 | 3674 days | 28% |
| Matt and Louise | 10/10 | 3717 days | 27% |
| Lenka Korinkova | 10/10 | 4016 days | 15% |
| Jiri Benda | 10/10 | 4016 days | 15% |
| Roeland Driessen | 10/10 | 4088 days | 12% |
| Oliver Andres | 10/10 | 4103 days | 11% |
| Douglas Yeates | 9/10 | 4360 days | 1% |
| Simeon W | 10/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| Stina Hultberg | 10/10 | 4398 days | 20% |
| Hadar | 10/10 | 4398 days | 20% |
| Linus Larsson | 6/10 | 4400 days | 18% |
| Marius Hoffmann | 9/10 | 4411 days | 20% |
| Daniel Naveh | 10/10 | 4442 days | 20% |
| Doran Swartz | 9/10 | 4443 days | 20% |
| Guy David | 7/10 | 4443 days | 19% |
| Sapir Lifshitz | 8/10 | 4443 days | 20% |
| Maya Barad | 9/10 | 4443 days | 20% |
| Sarah Strong | 10/10 | 4446 days | 20% |
| Thomas Roche | 10/10 | 4455 days | 20% |
| Omri Ifrsh | 10/10 | 4734 days | 20% |
| Pete Wilson | 9/10 | 4745 days | 20% |
| Tim Vennewold | 9/10 | 4746 days | 20% |
| Yves Vennewald | 10/10 | 4746 days | 20% |
| Pia Pitkala | 9/10 | 4748 days | 20% |
| Arno Leleu | 8/10 | 4768 days | 20% |
| Katharina Littlemann | 10/10 | 4771 days | 20% |
| Fabian and Teresa | 8/10 | 4780 days | 20% |
| Michael Neumann | 10/10 | 5111 days | 20% |
| Nicholas Prakenhammar | 7/10 | 5137 days | 19% |
| Jasmin Loeffler | 7/10 | 5435 days | 19% |
| Ofir Avimeir | 9/10 | 5468 days | 20% |
| Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5472 days | 20% |
| Todd Pang | 10/10 | 5474 days | 20% |
| Chrissy Crebas | 10/10 | 5475 days | 20% |
| Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5493 days | 20% |
| Thomas Reidinger | 7/10 | 5504 days | 19% |
| Eduard Wikidal | 3/10 | 5505 days | 11% |
| Wallet | 8/10 | 5517 days | 20% |
| Victoria Slater | 8/10 | 5829 days | 20% |
| Franz | 10/10 | 5852 days | 20% |
| Nicky and Andy Prescott | 8/10 | 5857 days | 20% |
| Matthias A | 9/10 | 5857 days | 20% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5938 days | 20% |
| Evan | 10/10 | 6006 days | 20% |
| SteveW | 8/10 | 6207 days | 20% |
| Francesca Sabat | 10/10 | 6211 days | 20% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mueller Hut Route does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.73% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.