G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mueller Hut Route.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
74 Valid Reviews
The Mueller Hut Route experience has a total of 74 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 74 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 38 |
|
51% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
12% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.81% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mueller Hut Route valid reviews is 90.81% and is based on 74 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
72 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 74 valid reviews, the experience has 72 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 72 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 36 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.56% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mueller Hut Route face-to-face reviews is 90.56% and is based on 72 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.14%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Therese Kacsics | 10/10 | 2782 days | 100% |
| Tomas Kotul | 9/10 | 3222 days | 71% |
| Madi | 10/10 | 3285 days | 68% |
| Kosia | 10/10 | 3285 days | 68% |
| Petr Jesko | 10/10 | 3296 days | 67% |
| Sandra Piechoua | 10/10 | 3296 days | 67% |
| Isabel | 9/10 | 3533 days | 52% |
| Jorg Muller | 10/10 | 3533 days | 52% |
| Anja Rakers | 9/10 | 3539 days | 51% |
| Mark Ryan | 10/10 | 3540 days | 52% |
| Marla | 7/10 | 3542 days | 48% |
| Matthias Hottex | 10/10 | 3545 days | 52% |
| Valerie Pauly | 7/10 | 3545 days | 48% |
| Jan Sojka | 10/10 | 3545 days | 52% |
| Denisa Tuckova | 10/10 | 3545 days | 52% |
| Daniel Weber | 7/10 | 3552 days | 48% |
| Szu-Yi Hsu | 9/10 | 3556 days | 50% |
| Chao Lai | 9/10 | 3556 days | 50% |
| Derick Trotter | 9/10 | 3557 days | 50% |
| Molly Bogeberg | 10/10 | 3560 days | 51% |
| Jiri Sojka | 9/10 | 3561 days | 50% |
| Lauren Goebel | 10/10 | 3566 days | 50% |
| Leon Schotter | 10/10 | 3567 days | 50% |
| Ellie Doughty | 8/10 | 3568 days | 49% |
| Lukas Havlicek | 9/10 | 3570 days | 49% |
| Regina Baum | 8/10 | 3570 days | 49% |
| Florian Baum | 10/10 | 3570 days | 50% |
| Joaquin Gruffat | 9/10 | 3572 days | 49% |
| Isaliner and Mathieu | 10/10 | 3577 days | 50% |
| Matt and Louise | 10/10 | 3620 days | 47% |
| Lenka Korinkova | 10/10 | 3919 days | 28% |
| Jiri Benda | 10/10 | 3919 days | 28% |
| Roeland Driessen | 10/10 | 3991 days | 23% |
| Oliver Andres | 10/10 | 4006 days | 22% |
| Douglas Yeates | 9/10 | 4263 days | 6% |
| Simeon W | 10/10 | 4279 days | 5% |
| Stina Hultberg | 10/10 | 4301 days | 4% |
| Hadar | 10/10 | 4301 days | 4% |
| Linus Larsson | 6/10 | 4303 days | 3% |
| Marius Hoffmann | 9/10 | 4314 days | 3% |
| Daniel Naveh | 10/10 | 4345 days | 1% |
| Doran Swartz | 9/10 | 4346 days | 1% |
| Guy David | 7/10 | 4346 days | 1% |
| Sapir Lifshitz | 8/10 | 4346 days | 1% |
| Maya Barad | 9/10 | 4346 days | 1% |
| Sarah Strong | 10/10 | 4349 days | 1% |
| Thomas Roche | 10/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| Omri Ifrsh | 10/10 | 4637 days | 31% |
| Pete Wilson | 9/10 | 4648 days | 31% |
| Tim Vennewold | 9/10 | 4649 days | 31% |
| Yves Vennewald | 10/10 | 4649 days | 31% |
| Pia Pitkala | 9/10 | 4651 days | 31% |
| Arno Leleu | 8/10 | 4671 days | 30% |
| Katharina Littlemann | 10/10 | 4674 days | 31% |
| Fabian and Teresa | 8/10 | 4683 days | 30% |
| Michael Neumann | 10/10 | 5014 days | 31% |
| Nicholas Prakenhammar | 7/10 | 5040 days | 29% |
| Jasmin Loeffler | 7/10 | 5338 days | 29% |
| Ofir Avimeir | 9/10 | 5371 days | 31% |
| Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5375 days | 31% |
| Todd Pang | 10/10 | 5377 days | 31% |
| Chrissy Crebas | 10/10 | 5378 days | 31% |
| Andreas Fritesche | 10/10 | 5396 days | 31% |
| Thomas Reidinger | 7/10 | 5407 days | 29% |
| Eduard Wikidal | 3/10 | 5408 days | 16% |
| Wallet | 8/10 | 5420 days | 30% |
| Victoria Slater | 8/10 | 5732 days | 30% |
| Franz | 10/10 | 5755 days | 31% |
| Nicky and Andy Prescott | 8/10 | 5760 days | 30% |
| Matthias A | 9/10 | 5760 days | 31% |
| martint | 10/10 | 5841 days | 31% |
| Evan | 10/10 | 5909 days | 31% |
| SteveW | 8/10 | 6110 days | 30% |
| Francesca Sabat | 10/10 | 6114 days | 31% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mueller Hut Route does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.73% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.