G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for U Fly Extreme.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
U Fly Extreme
Valid Reviews
68 Valid Reviews
The U Fly Extreme experience has a total of 68 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 68 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
93% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
99.12% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the U Fly Extreme valid reviews is 99.12% and is based on 68 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
20 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 68 valid reviews, the experience has 20 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 20 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
75% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
5% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
97.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the U Fly Extreme face-to-face reviews is 97.00% and is based on 20 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
99.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greg Little | 10/10 | 3631 days | 80% |
| Dieter Schmees | 10/10 | 3654 days | 77% |
| Jonas Olsen | 10/10 | 3887 days | 65% |
| Alex Sheldon | 10/10 | 3973 days | 43% |
| Jeremy Maurer | 10/10 | 4038 days | 45% |
| Patrycja Polakowska | 10/10 | 4323 days | 5% |
| William Haynie | 10/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
| babune48 | 10/10 | 4433 days | 68% |
| jimmyviera | 10/10 | 4433 days | 68% |
| Shaktale | 10/10 | 4464 days | 68% |
| shaynelighty | 10/10 | 4464 days | 68% |
| tateyjnr | 10/10 | 4617 days | 68% |
| Rufus_Katz | 10/10 | 4678 days | 68% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 4682 days | 54% |
| hankharris | 10/10 | 4738 days | 68% |
| Swedes | 10/10 | 4769 days | 68% |
| Bastian_Heinz | 10/10 | 4769 days | 68% |
| katel86 | 10/10 | 4860 days | 68% |
| Adam Duus-Boolsen | 9/10 | 5036 days | 54% |
| migraineur | 10/10 | 5072 days | 68% |
| ashafir | 10/10 | 5072 days | 68% |
| Mick Doherty | 10/10 | 5103 days | 68% |
| starkstromspielplatz | 10/10 | 5103 days | 68% |
| daw1906 | 10/10 | 5134 days | 68% |
| shehlit | 10/10 | 5134 days | 68% |
| kirstgb | 10/10 | 5195 days | 68% |
| slipsius | 10/10 | 5195 days | 68% |
| Timoe | 10/10 | 5225 days | 68% |
| ChunHow | 10/10 | 5225 days | 68% |
| dgavish | 10/10 | 5287 days | 68% |
| cam2004 | 10/10 | 5317 days | 68% |
| michael | 10/10 | 5317 days | 68% |
| Andrew Cooke | 10/10 | 5378 days | 68% |
| Moritz | 10/10 | 5378 days | 68% |
| Ellie Parkes | 10/10 | 5437 days | 68% |
| sirstroh | 10/10 | 5437 days | 68% |
| Amanda Hoff | 10/10 | 5437 days | 68% |
| Polo | 10/10 | 5468 days | 68% |
| Mira | 10/10 | 5499 days | 68% |
| Bart de Jong | 10/10 | 5499 days | 68% |
| Vivienne O'Reilly | 9/10 | 5522 days | 54% |
| torandsimon | 10/10 | 5529 days | 68% |
| mzx2 | 10/10 | 5529 days | 68% |
| Claire Salter | 10/10 | 5560 days | 68% |
| NZJenJen | 10/10 | 5590 days | 68% |
| Aaron Farry | 10/10 | 5621 days | 68% |
| mayo | 10/10 | 5652 days | 68% |
| Jeremy | 8/10 | 5744 days | 53% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 5745 days | 68% |
| KjellR | 10/10 | 5745 days | 54% |
| CharityW | 9/10 | 5745 days | 54% |
| RichardA | 10/10 | 5750 days | 54% |
| Anne Hofer | 10/10 | 5780 days | 68% |
| crazyklaus | 10/10 | 5782 days | 68% |
| mash | 10/10 | 5789 days | 68% |
| Darroch Footprint Travel Guides | 10/10 | 5790 days | 68% |
| Jhon | 10/10 | 5793 days | 54% |
| davy | 10/10 | 5794 days | 68% |
| Timg | 10/10 | 5795 days | 54% |
| Oliver Hoppe | 10/10 | 5887 days | 68% |
| Sune | 9/10 | 5933 days | 54% |
| Christina Endicott | 10/10 | 6039 days | 54% |
| Brian Endicott | 10/10 | 6039 days | 54% |
| Katherine Humphrey | 10/10 | 6072 days | 54% |
| Phil Ritchie | 10/10 | 6088 days | 54% |
| Emma Parsons | 10/10 | 6088 days | 54% |
| Jenny Hancock | 10/10 | 6088 days | 54% |
| BCanuck | 10/10 | 6092 days | 68% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The U Fly Extreme experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.04% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the U Fly Extreme experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The U Fly Extreme experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.97% |
| 198 | -3.99% |
| 199 | -4.02% |
| 200 | -4.04% |
| 201 | -4.06% |
| 202 | -4.08% |
| 203 | -4.10% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.41% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.