Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for U Fly Extreme.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

CC
Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

U Fly Extreme

Valid Reviews

68 Valid Reviews

The U Fly Extreme experience has a total of 68 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 68 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 63
93%
9/10 4
6%
8/10 1
1%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

99.12% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the U Fly Extreme valid reviews is 99.12% and is based on 68 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

20 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 68 valid reviews, the experience has 20 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 20 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
75%
9/10 4
20%
8/10 1
5%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

97.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the U Fly Extreme face-to-face reviews is 97.00% and is based on 20 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

99.25%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Greg Little 10/10 3757 days 70%
Dieter Schmees 10/10 3780 days 65%
Jonas Olsen 10/10 4013 days 37%
Alex Sheldon 10/10 4099 days 2%
Jeremy Maurer 10/10 4164 days 0%
Patrycja Polakowska 10/10 4449 days 48%
William Haynie 10/10 4498 days 72%
babune48 10/10 4559 days 72%
jimmyviera 10/10 4559 days 72%
Shaktale 10/10 4590 days 72%
shaynelighty 10/10 4590 days 72%
tateyjnr 10/10 4743 days 72%
Rufus_Katz 10/10 4804 days 72%
Daniel 10/10 4808 days 48%
hankharris 10/10 4864 days 72%
Swedes 10/10 4895 days 72%
Bastian_Heinz 10/10 4895 days 72%
katel86 10/10 4986 days 72%
Adam Duus-Boolsen 9/10 5162 days 46%
migraineur 10/10 5198 days 72%
ashafir 10/10 5198 days 72%
Mick Doherty 10/10 5229 days 72%
starkstromspielplatz 10/10 5229 days 72%
daw1906 10/10 5260 days 72%
shehlit 10/10 5260 days 72%
kirstgb 10/10 5321 days 72%
slipsius 10/10 5321 days 72%
Timoe 10/10 5351 days 72%
ChunHow 10/10 5351 days 72%
dgavish 10/10 5413 days 72%
cam2004 10/10 5443 days 72%
michael 10/10 5443 days 72%
Andrew Cooke 10/10 5504 days 72%
Moritz 10/10 5504 days 72%
Ellie Parkes 10/10 5563 days 72%
sirstroh 10/10 5563 days 72%
Amanda Hoff 10/10 5563 days 72%
Polo 10/10 5594 days 72%
Mira 10/10 5625 days 72%
Bart de Jong 10/10 5625 days 72%
Vivienne O'Reilly 9/10 5648 days 46%
torandsimon 10/10 5655 days 72%
mzx2 10/10 5655 days 72%
Claire Salter 10/10 5686 days 72%
NZJenJen 10/10 5716 days 72%
Aaron Farry 10/10 5747 days 72%
mayo 10/10 5778 days 72%
Jeremy 8/10 5870 days 45%
Neal 10/10 5871 days 72%
KjellR 10/10 5871 days 48%
CharityW 9/10 5871 days 46%
RichardA 10/10 5876 days 48%
Anne Hofer 10/10 5906 days 72%
crazyklaus 10/10 5908 days 72%
mash 10/10 5915 days 72%
Darroch Footprint Travel Guides 10/10 5916 days 72%
Jhon 10/10 5919 days 48%
davy 10/10 5919 days 72%
Timg 10/10 5921 days 48%
Oliver Hoppe 10/10 6013 days 72%
Sune 9/10 6059 days 46%
Christina Endicott 10/10 6165 days 48%
Brian Endicott 10/10 6165 days 48%
Katherine Humphrey 10/10 6198 days 48%
Phil Ritchie 10/10 6214 days 48%
Emma Parsons 10/10 6214 days 48%
Jenny Hancock 10/10 6214 days 48%
BCanuck 10/10 6217 days 72%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The U Fly Extreme experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.23% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 73 days. However the U Fly Extreme experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The U Fly Extreme experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.18%
198 -3.19%
199 -3.21%
200 -3.23%
201 -3.24%
202 -3.26%
203 -3.27%

Balancing Adjustment

0.34% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

96%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.