G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for U Fly Extreme.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

CC
Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

U Fly Extreme

Valid Reviews

68 Valid Reviews

The U Fly Extreme experience has a total of 68 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 68 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 63
93%
9/10 4
6%
8/10 1
1%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

99.12% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the U Fly Extreme valid reviews is 99.12% and is based on 68 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

20 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 68 valid reviews, the experience has 20 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 20 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
75%
9/10 4
20%
8/10 1
5%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

97.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the U Fly Extreme face-to-face reviews is 97.00% and is based on 20 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

99.26%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Greg Little 10/10 3692 days 67%
Dieter Schmees 10/10 3715 days 62%
Jonas Olsen 10/10 3948 days 37%
Alex Sheldon 10/10 4034 days -1%
Jeremy Maurer 10/10 4099 days 0%
Patrycja Polakowska 10/10 4384 days 32%
William Haynie 10/10 4433 days 57%
babune48 10/10 4494 days 57%
jimmyviera 10/10 4494 days 57%
Shaktale 10/10 4525 days 57%
shaynelighty 10/10 4525 days 57%
tateyjnr 10/10 4678 days 57%
Rufus_Katz 10/10 4739 days 57%
Daniel 10/10 4743 days 32%
hankharris 10/10 4799 days 57%
Swedes 10/10 4830 days 57%
Bastian_Heinz 10/10 4830 days 57%
katel86 10/10 4921 days 57%
Adam Duus-Boolsen 9/10 5097 days 30%
migraineur 10/10 5133 days 57%
ashafir 10/10 5133 days 57%
Mick Doherty 10/10 5164 days 57%
starkstromspielplatz 10/10 5164 days 57%
daw1906 10/10 5195 days 57%
shehlit 10/10 5195 days 57%
kirstgb 10/10 5256 days 57%
slipsius 10/10 5256 days 57%
Timoe 10/10 5286 days 57%
ChunHow 10/10 5286 days 57%
dgavish 10/10 5348 days 57%
cam2004 10/10 5378 days 57%
michael 10/10 5378 days 57%
Andrew Cooke 10/10 5439 days 57%
Moritz 10/10 5439 days 57%
Ellie Parkes 10/10 5498 days 57%
sirstroh 10/10 5498 days 57%
Amanda Hoff 10/10 5498 days 57%
Polo 10/10 5529 days 57%
Mira 10/10 5560 days 57%
Bart de Jong 10/10 5560 days 57%
Vivienne O'Reilly 9/10 5583 days 30%
torandsimon 10/10 5590 days 57%
mzx2 10/10 5590 days 57%
Claire Salter 10/10 5621 days 57%
NZJenJen 10/10 5651 days 57%
Aaron Farry 10/10 5682 days 57%
mayo 10/10 5713 days 57%
Jeremy 8/10 5804 days 29%
Neal 10/10 5806 days 57%
KjellR 10/10 5806 days 32%
CharityW 9/10 5806 days 30%
RichardA 10/10 5811 days 32%
Anne Hofer 10/10 5841 days 57%
crazyklaus 10/10 5842 days 57%
mash 10/10 5850 days 57%
Darroch Footprint Travel Guides 10/10 5851 days 57%
Jhon 10/10 5853 days 32%
davy 10/10 5854 days 57%
Timg 10/10 5855 days 32%
Oliver Hoppe 10/10 5948 days 57%
Sune 9/10 5993 days 30%
Christina Endicott 10/10 6099 days 32%
Brian Endicott 10/10 6099 days 32%
Katherine Humphrey 10/10 6133 days 32%
Phil Ritchie 10/10 6149 days 32%
Emma Parsons 10/10 6149 days 32%
Jenny Hancock 10/10 6149 days 32%
BCanuck 10/10 6152 days 57%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The U Fly Extreme experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.14% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 53 days. However the U Fly Extreme experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The U Fly Extreme experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.08%
198 -4.10%
199 -4.12%
200 -4.14%
201 -4.16%
202 -4.19%
203 -4.21%

Balancing Adjustment

0.42% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

96%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.