Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Jucy Cruise Milford Sound.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
205 Valid Reviews
The Jucy Cruise Milford Sound experience has a total of 209 reviews. There are 205 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 205 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 59 |
|
29% |
9/10 | 51 |
|
25% |
8/10 | 50 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 29 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 11 |
|
5% |
5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.93% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jucy Cruise Milford Sound valid reviews is 84.93% and is based on 205 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
178 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 205 valid reviews, the experience has 178 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 178 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 43 |
|
24% |
9/10 | 46 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 44 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 29 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 11 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Jucy Cruise Milford Sound face-to-face reviews is 83.60% and is based on 178 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.08%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Rebecca, Colin & Leo | 10/10 | 2431 days | 100% |
Michael Gooch | 10/10 | 2612 days | 90% |
Rebekka Doliva | 10/10 | 2681 days | 86% |
Jayni L'Azou | 10/10 | 2719 days | 84% |
Ludovic Bonneau | 10/10 | 2925 days | 73% |
Roland Eggli | 10/10 | 2927 days | 72% |
Mike | 8/10 | 2941 days | 70% |
Alexander Scheibl | 7/10 | 2942 days | 66% |
Jaroslav Kacmar | 10/10 | 2963 days | 70% |
Gena Bond | 8/10 | 2986 days | 68% |
Taylor Doolittle | 10/10 | 2986 days | 69% |
Barbara Hirsch | 7/10 | 2996 days | 63% |
Jack Halligan | 9/10 | 2999 days | 68% |
Sam Howard | 10/10 | 2999 days | 68% |
Kosia | 10/10 | 3034 days | 66% |
Navina | 10/10 | 3039 days | 66% |
HAFEZ AMRI SANUSI | 8/10 | 3039 days | 65% |
Joanne Woo | 8/10 | 3069 days | 63% |
Viki Kent | 10/10 | 3075 days | 64% |
Ross D | 9/10 | 3075 days | 63% |
Azhar Adlan | 10/10 | 3076 days | 64% |
Anne | 9/10 | 3087 days | 63% |
Philippa Buchanan | 9/10 | 3185 days | 57% |
Rabiah Abdullah | 10/10 | 3283 days | 53% |
Sarah Boettcher | 10/10 | 3289 days | 52% |
Annika Pauly | 6/10 | 3294 days | 44% |
Caroline Shaw | 8/10 | 3300 days | 50% |
Julia | 7/10 | 3300 days | 47% |
Bjoern | 6/10 | 3300 days | 43% |
Sonya Grimm | 8/10 | 3300 days | 50% |
Milan Maiwald | 6/10 | 3301 days | 43% |
Lisa Fenzl | 10/10 | 3303 days | 51% |
Afiya Levy | 10/10 | 3303 days | 51% |
gonzalo caldiz | 9/10 | 3304 days | 51% |
Lærke Hagelskjær | 10/10 | 3307 days | 51% |
Juan Viscegle | 10/10 | 3308 days | 51% |
Jonathan Foskett | 9/10 | 3310 days | 50% |
Helen Hazelwood | 9/10 | 3310 days | 50% |
Ruby Reynolds | 9/10 | 3310 days | 50% |
Aaron Gunning | 10/10 | 3318 days | 51% |
Liwen | 3/10 | 3318 days | 24% |
Verena Konetzhi | 7/10 | 3321 days | 46% |
Lena | 8/10 | 3325 days | 49% |
Kim-Lara | 9/10 | 3333 days | 49% |
Alyssa Wyer | 10/10 | 3351 days | 49% |
Simon Striegel | 10/10 | 3352 days | 49% |
Chris | 9/10 | 3360 days | 48% |
Anais Touri | 10/10 | 3363 days | 48% |
Matt and Louise | 7/10 | 3369 days | 44% |
Daniel Hill | 9/10 | 3370 days | 47% |
Chris | 10/10 | 3374 days | 48% |
Neil | 8/10 | 3379 days | 46% |
SATOKO OSONO | 8/10 | 3386 days | 46% |
Diego Pablos | 7/10 | 3394 days | 43% |
Pierre and Alexandra | 9/10 | 3402 days | 45% |
Mark Van Wijk | 10/10 | 3466 days | 42% |
David McIntosh | 9/10 | 3716 days | 28% |
Lukas, Anne and Malte | 9/10 | 3772 days | 25% |
Logan Leduc | 10/10 | 3777 days | 25% |
Hubert Schmid | 8/10 | 3825 days | 22% |
Anna Grafenstein | 8/10 | 4011 days | 12% |
isabel Zander | 8/10 | 4014 days | 11% |
Calvin Becker | 7/10 | 4014 days | 10% |
Patricia Revel | 10/10 | 4016 days | 12% |
Jacques Revel | 8/10 | 4016 days | 11% |
Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 7/10 | 4018 days | 10% |
Claudia Hillebrand | 8/10 | 4019 days | 11% |
Audrey Le Bourthe | 10/10 | 4024 days | 11% |
Stefan Glock | 8/10 | 4029 days | 11% |
Andreas Liebe | 9/10 | 4029 days | 11% |
Jana Rutkowski | 8/10 | 4032 days | 10% |
Sarah Jane O'Reilly | 7/10 | 4042 days | 9% |
Tomas Shairi | 5/10 | 4042 days | 6% |
Agathe Dupuis | 7/10 | 4043 days | 9% |
Florent Bouillon | 7/10 | 4043 days | 9% |
Lena Hanhart | 6/10 | 4043 days | 8% |
Jonas Hessel | 8/10 | 4043 days | 10% |
Lena Wacker | 10/10 | 4057 days | 9% |
Marius Hoffmann | 8/10 | 4063 days | 9% |
Anna Guzewiez | 8/10 | 4065 days | 9% |
Carina Borho | 9/10 | 4080 days | 8% |
Lena Jensen | 9/10 | 4081 days | 8% |
Jesper Andersen | 9/10 | 4081 days | 8% |
Markus Spitzmueller | 9/10 | 4081 days | 8% |
Henry Thiel | 9/10 | 4086 days | 8% |
Christina Habranke | 9/10 | 4086 days | 8% |
Claire Lieval | 5/10 | 4093 days | 4% |
Nora Zeitz | 5/10 | 4104 days | 3% |
Marc Greeve | 6/10 | 4113 days | 4% |
Yvonne Horpershoeh | 7/10 | 4113 days | 5% |
Ron Williams | 9/10 | 4226 days | 0% |
Stefan | 9/10 | 4396 days | 20% |
Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4396 days | 20% |
Cervenka Jaroslav | 9/10 | 4403 days | 20% |
Jitka Zenahlikova | 9/10 | 4403 days | 20% |
Billy Koichopolos | 10/10 | 4404 days | 20% |
Gina Lisi | 10/10 | 4404 days | 20% |
Katey Justice | 8/10 | 4406 days | 19% |
Andrew Grimes | 9/10 | 4406 days | 20% |
Lynda Quartay | 9/10 | 4406 days | 20% |
Douglas Walker | 7/10 | 4406 days | 18% |
Kariuua S | 7/10 | 4408 days | 18% |
Nicolas Bessiere | 7/10 | 4408 days | 18% |
Renate | 7/10 | 4414 days | 18% |
Erik Muchembled | 8/10 | 4415 days | 19% |
Eric | 8/10 | 4416 days | 19% |
Rogier Ramaker | 9/10 | 4416 days | 20% |
Melvin Groenhof | 8/10 | 4416 days | 19% |
Anna Neuenfeldt | 9/10 | 4417 days | 20% |
Janine Kohlgrueler | 10/10 | 4418 days | 20% |
Maja Bogdanowicz | 8/10 | 4418 days | 19% |
Sara Omary | 8/10 | 4421 days | 19% |
Tim Sautter | 9/10 | 4424 days | 20% |
Francis Runge | 8/10 | 4425 days | 19% |
Bill and Noreen | 9/10 | 4437 days | 20% |
Kevin Desjandino | 10/10 | 4488 days | 20% |
Abby Rushmer | 8/10 | 4500 days | 19% |
Benedicte and Mathilde Colas | 8/10 | 4504 days | 19% |
Jenben | 10/10 | 4531 days | 20% |
Loesje | 8/10 | 4562 days | 19% |
Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 4760 days | 20% |
Andreas Schacke | 7/10 | 4761 days | 18% |
Barbara Berkhout | 9/10 | 4761 days | 20% |
David Williams | 9/10 | 4764 days | 20% |
Delore | 5/10 | 4769 days | 13% |
Sabrina Germany | 10/10 | 4771 days | 20% |
Maxine Gilman | 10/10 | 4771 days | 20% |
Peter & Kate Carmichael | 9/10 | 4787 days | 20% |
Tom Pratt | 6/10 | 4788 days | 16% |
Ken | 10/10 | 4789 days | 20% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4790 days | 20% |
Gabriele Wendt | 9/10 | 4790 days | 20% |
Diane Moss | 8/10 | 4790 days | 19% |
R Straathof | 6/10 | 4792 days | 16% |
Jonathan Philp | 7/10 | 4797 days | 18% |
Anna | 9/10 | 4803 days | 20% |
Lesley | 8/10 | 4836 days | 19% |
Jensen Bresbenbeek | 8/10 | 4868 days | 19% |
Bernhard & Brigitte Gosch | 8/10 | 4874 days | 19% |
Thomas Klebensberger | 10/10 | 5106 days | 20% |
Ken Talan | 10/10 | 5106 days | 20% |
Sean Brownell | 7/10 | 5111 days | 18% |
Mariette Salden | 9/10 | 5115 days | 20% |
Ed Piotrowski | 7/10 | 5119 days | 18% |
Prideaux | 6/10 | 5121 days | 16% |
Bill Mclennan | 10/10 | 5124 days | 20% |
Sophia Kelly | 8/10 | 5126 days | 19% |
Dave Lidgard | 9/10 | 5129 days | 20% |
Oppenoorth | 9/10 | 5130 days | 20% |
Mark Walker | 9/10 | 5130 days | 20% |
T Lipscombe | 6/10 | 5134 days | 16% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 5135 days | 20% |
Michael Long | 8/10 | 5135 days | 19% |
Javier Munoz | 7/10 | 5135 days | 18% |
Birga | 10/10 | 5139 days | 20% |
Jerry & Floon | 8/10 | 5140 days | 19% |
Jessica Vogels | 6/10 | 5140 days | 16% |
Simon Vickers | 10/10 | 5141 days | 20% |
Elise van Haastert | 9/10 | 5141 days | 20% |
Jesper Hassel | 8/10 | 5147 days | 19% |
Carolin Moberg | 9/10 | 5147 days | 20% |
Flueckiger | 10/10 | 5151 days | 20% |
Marleen Meyers | 8/10 | 5153 days | 19% |
Dieter Uhlmann | 6/10 | 5153 days | 16% |
Sabrina Sari | 7/10 | 5155 days | 18% |
Claudia Vermeer | 7/10 | 5156 days | 18% |
Irene and Thib Schneider | 10/10 | 5158 days | 20% |
Tom Hill | 9/10 | 5165 days | 20% |
Bronwyn Mewett | 9/10 | 5170 days | 20% |
Morgan892 | 10/10 | 5262 days | 20% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 5293 days | 20% |
imbeachy | 10/10 | 5322 days | 20% |
Trisha | 10/10 | 5353 days | 20% |
Meg & Steve | 7/10 | 5439 days | 18% |
rinusm | 8/10 | 5442 days | 19% |
steveE | 9/10 | 5445 days | 20% |
Jess | 10/10 | 5481 days | 20% |
Inbar Yizhar Barnea | 10/10 | 5495 days | 20% |
Peter G | 8/10 | 5501 days | 19% |
Chris Helms | 7/10 | 5501 days | 18% |
Jamie | 8/10 | 5527 days | 19% |
Schygulla | 8/10 | 5527 days | 19% |
margaret Klawitter | 10/10 | 5528 days | 20% |
kate | 10/10 | 5532 days | 20% |
Jules | 7/10 | 5532 days | 18% |
Frances Hay | 8/10 | 5534 days | 19% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5591 days | 20% |
Suzanne | 9/10 | 5658 days | 20% |
Andrea | 8/10 | 5760 days | 19% |
jessica | 7/10 | 5761 days | 18% |
KimC | 8/10 | 5828 days | 19% |
Denys | 7/10 | 5845 days | 18% |
JohannaB | 10/10 | 5860 days | 20% |
ChristineM | 10/10 | 5874 days | 20% |
SiegfriedL | 9/10 | 5896 days | 20% |
johanna | 9/10 | 5914 days | 20% |
MissTraveller2009 | 10/10 | 5962 days | 20% |
jack | 8/10 | 5962 days | 19% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 6034 days | 20% |
Thomas Bachmann | 9/10 | 6089 days | 20% |
Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 6225 days | 19% |
Alison Street | 7/10 | 6240 days | 18% |
Jurgen Westphal | 8/10 | 6241 days | 19% |
John Howlett | 8/10 | 6257 days | 19% |
Davinia | 8/10 | 6316 days | 19% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Jucy Cruise Milford Sound experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.79% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 59 days. However the Jucy Cruise Milford Sound experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Jucy Cruise Milford Sound experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.73% |
198 | -3.75% |
199 | -3.77% |
200 | -3.79% |
201 | -3.81% |
202 | -3.83% |
203 | -3.85% |
… | … |
2.18% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.