Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Waitomo Caveworld.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Waitomo Caveworld
Valid Reviews
74 Valid Reviews
The Waitomo Caveworld experience has a total of 74 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 74 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
20% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 8 |
|
11% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waitomo Caveworld valid reviews is 81.35% and is based on 74 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
68 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 74 valid reviews, the experience has 68 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 68 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waitomo Caveworld face-to-face reviews is 82.50% and is based on 68 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
82.43%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cassandra Geyer | 9/10 | 3154 days | 100% |
| Mijke Boesten | 8/10 | 3209 days | 93% |
| Anders Hauke | 8/10 | 3210 days | 93% |
| Lengxi | 8/10 | 3210 days | 93% |
| Arvid Hellquist | 9/10 | 3582 days | 57% |
| Steven Lotrian | 9/10 | 3929 days | 22% |
| Alex Artigues | 10/10 | 3977 days | 17% |
| Serge Garcin | 10/10 | 3977 days | 17% |
| Tourist101 | 2/10 | 4431 days | 0% |
| kayburns | 9/10 | 4492 days | 28% |
| Alison Rosser | 7/10 | 4668 days | 25% |
| Helen & Laurence | 8/10 | 4743 days | 27% |
| Kris Gijbels | 8/10 | 4989 days | 27% |
| Mike | 6/10 | 5027 days | 21% |
| Stefan Morris | 8/10 | 5030 days | 27% |
| Jessie Currie | 7/10 | 5030 days | 25% |
| Barry | 9/10 | 5032 days | 28% |
| Melanie Armbruster | 6/10 | 5035 days | 21% |
| Stefanie Halbrock | 5/10 | 5035 days | 16% |
| Jim Thomsen | 8/10 | 5036 days | 27% |
| Kate Thomsen | 8/10 | 5036 days | 27% |
| Denecke Thorsten | 7/10 | 5385 days | 25% |
| M and H Lunn | 8/10 | 5385 days | 27% |
| Henrik Plichta | 9/10 | 5385 days | 28% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 5386 days | 28% |
| San Ahuia | 5/10 | 5395 days | 16% |
| Amer | 10/10 | 5401 days | 28% |
| Coby Aalbrecht | 7/10 | 5403 days | 25% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 5474 days | 27% |
| X Otte | 7/10 | 5474 days | 25% |
| Hansjoerg Ehrmann | 9/10 | 5477 days | 28% |
| Sophie Keate | 8/10 | 5594 days | 27% |
| Catherine Smiles | 10/10 | 5624 days | 28% |
| Martina | 6/10 | 5710 days | 21% |
| IanM | 8/10 | 5710 days | 27% |
| MarielR | 9/10 | 5728 days | 28% |
| Joel | 9/10 | 5730 days | 28% |
| Brigette Guikens | 10/10 | 5731 days | 28% |
| Keith | 7/10 | 5734 days | 25% |
| JuliaG1 | 8/10 | 5743 days | 27% |
| DavidMurray | 8/10 | 5744 days | 27% |
| RosC | 6/10 | 5745 days | 21% |
| AndrewF78 | 9/10 | 5746 days | 28% |
| EmmaB1 | 9/10 | 5756 days | 28% |
| ClaudiaK | 10/10 | 5759 days | 28% |
| ArnarF | 9/10 | 5769 days | 28% |
| SonjaS | 10/10 | 5769 days | 28% |
| Burkhalter | 9/10 | 5781 days | 28% |
| Rene | 7/10 | 5782 days | 25% |
| Paula | 8/10 | 5835 days | 27% |
| Teresa | 10/10 | 5841 days | 28% |
| Kay | 10/10 | 5889 days | 28% |
| Jimmy | 9/10 | 5907 days | 28% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 5907 days | 28% |
| sabine | 10/10 | 5907 days | 28% |
| Elisabeth | 10/10 | 5916 days | 28% |
| Terneal King | 7/10 | 5948 days | 25% |
| Helen | 6/10 | 5958 days | 21% |
| Nicnac | 8/10 | 6075 days | 27% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 6080 days | 28% |
| Joanne M | 7/10 | 6086 days | 25% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6087 days | 28% |
| Leila | 9/10 | 6090 days | 28% |
| Adam Richards | 8/10 | 6090 days | 27% |
| Lena1 | 9/10 | 6110 days | 28% |
| Stephanie | 9/10 | 6122 days | 28% |
| Hanna | 6/10 | 6123 days | 21% |
| Maree | 8/10 | 6123 days | 27% |
| Orlaith | 9/10 | 6123 days | 28% |
| Lisa | 8/10 | 6123 days | 27% |
| Stephanie Jones | 6/10 | 6150 days | 21% |
| Paula Smith | 7/10 | 6153 days | 25% |
| Bridgy | 8/10 | 6400 days | 27% |
| JanKovar | 6/10 | 6428 days | 21% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Waitomo Caveworld experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.03% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Waitomo Caveworld experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Waitomo Caveworld experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.97% |
| 198 | -3.99% |
| 199 | -4.01% |
| 200 | -4.03% |
| 201 | -4.05% |
| 202 | -4.07% |
| 203 | -4.09% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
3.47% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.