G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Abel Tasman Independent Guides.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Abel Tasman Independent Guides
Valid Reviews
47 Valid Reviews
The Abel Tasman Independent Guides experience has a total of 48 reviews. There are 47 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 13 |
|
28% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
84.89% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Independent Guides valid reviews is 84.89% and is based on 47 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
31 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 47 valid reviews, the experience has 31 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 31 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 5 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.87% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Independent Guides face-to-face reviews is 83.87% and is based on 31 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
86.62%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shelly | 10/10 | 1815 days | 100% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 1815 days | 99% |
| Fred | 10/10 | 1845 days | 99% |
| Andrea | 6/10 | 1968 days | 81% |
| Kazz Basma | 10/10 | 2394 days | 77% |
| David Jenen | 10/10 | 2452 days | 75% |
| Morten | 1/10 | 2786 days | 24% |
| Jolien | 7/10 | 2838 days | 55% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 3867 days | 18% |
| Callum | 8/10 | 3867 days | 18% |
| Jeremy Eng | 8/10 | 4220 days | 5% |
| Jan & Jile | 6/10 | 4225 days | 4% |
| DannySupertramp | 10/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| Johannes | 10/10 | 4599 days | 19% |
| maresca | 10/10 | 4737 days | 19% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 4767 days | 19% |
| Katharina Dierkes | 9/10 | 4966 days | 19% |
| Sven | 8/10 | 4966 days | 18% |
| Luise Jaeger | 9/10 | 4969 days | 19% |
| Helen Keighley | 7/10 | 4971 days | 17% |
| Kristie | 8/10 | 5002 days | 18% |
| Carina Raeder | 7/10 | 5342 days | 17% |
| Geoff Renshaw | 10/10 | 5417 days | 19% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 5650 days | 17% |
| ElissaH | 8/10 | 5652 days | 18% |
| AoamC | 8/10 | 5652 days | 18% |
| Nicola | 8/10 | 5653 days | 18% |
| Paul | 8/10 | 5653 days | 18% |
| Neal | 9/10 | 5653 days | 19% |
| Hendrik Flier | 9/10 | 5656 days | 19% |
| peter welsh | 10/10 | 5668 days | 19% |
| SabrineK | 8/10 | 5682 days | 18% |
| CrishnGermany | 9/10 | 5685 days | 19% |
| LorraineB | 8/10 | 5685 days | 18% |
| KasperDenmark | 10/10 | 5692 days | 19% |
| Jonathan Liew | 9/10 | 5718 days | 19% |
| ali_m | 8/10 | 5719 days | 18% |
| Axel | 9/10 | 5755 days | 19% |
| Abby | 9/10 | 6015 days | 19% |
| Klaus | 7/10 | 6030 days | 17% |
| Omer Harron | 9/10 | 6030 days | 19% |
| Laurie | 9/10 | 6061 days | 19% |
| Amanda Finger | 10/10 | 6098 days | 19% |
| Desiree Muri | 10/10 | 6098 days | 19% |
| tiss | 10/10 | 6141 days | 19% |
| Renee | 8/10 | 6390 days | 18% |
| Jossy | 9/10 | 6419 days | 19% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Abel Tasman Independent Guides experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.03% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 75 days. However the Abel Tasman Independent Guides experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Abel Tasman Independent Guides experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.98% |
| 198 | -3.00% |
| 199 | -3.01% |
| 200 | -3.03% |
| 201 | -3.04% |
| 202 | -3.06% |
| 203 | -3.07% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
2.11% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.