Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Swimming with Dolphins.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

CC
Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Swimming with Dolphins

Valid Reviews

60 Valid Reviews

The Swimming with Dolphins experience has a total of 61 reviews. There are 60 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 60 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 23
38%
9/10 12
20%
8/10 12
20%
7/10 10
17%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.67% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Swimming with Dolphins valid reviews is 86.67% and is based on 60 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

53 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 60 valid reviews, the experience has 53 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 18
34%
9/10 11
21%
8/10 12
23%
7/10 9
17%
6/10 2
4%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.66% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Swimming with Dolphins face-to-face reviews is 85.66% and is based on 53 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

86.86%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Isabel 4/10 3291 days 52%
Alix 10/10 3294 days 100%
Claire 10/10 3294 days 100%
Lena 7/10 3334 days 86%
Stefano 8/10 3361 days 89%
Ivan Dupont 7/10 3365 days 82%
Max Backelandt 7/10 4034 days 2%
Marie Toulemonde 8/10 4034 days 4%
Annika Marz 7/10 4047 days 1%
Julian Zeissler 7/10 4047 days 1%
Lena Hanhart 7/10 4052 days 0%
Barbara 10/10 4070 days 1%
Mark and Eefie 9/10 4495 days 26%
Nigel Leighton 10/10 4498 days 26%
Laura Diepeveen 8/10 4790 days 25%
Stam 8/10 4796 days 25%
cpope 10/10 4845 days 26%
Naomi Kosteaman 9/10 5155 days 26%
Samuel Prechel 9/10 5171 days 26%
Niels Van Welsenes 10/10 5179 days 26%
salsnz 10/10 5455 days 26%
Jvjm Family 6/10 5504 days 17%
Sinjc Grude 8/10 5541 days 25%
Rachel & Barak 9/10 5542 days 26%
Jeremy & Sarah Rind 10/10 5543 days 26%
Andreas Sterki 8/10 5614 days 25%
Gina Swindells 10/10 5617 days 26%
bogaard 9/10 5732 days 26%
Amy_B 10/10 5838 days 26%
NancyB 9/10 5838 days 26%
TraceyM 8/10 5838 days 25%
DanielGermany 6/10 5843 days 17%
AndreaT 10/10 5846 days 26%
Sue Green 10/10 5850 days 26%
Greg18 7/10 5850 days 22%
DavidJ 8/10 5856 days 25%
Stolz 10/10 5874 days 26%
LindaV 7/10 5884 days 22%
Ian 10/10 5898 days 26%
HelenUK 8/10 5900 days 25%
enthusejohn 10/10 5901 days 26%
Camilla E 9/10 5906 days 26%
Zoe Summers 10/10 6062 days 26%
Benjamin Throk 9/10 6229 days 26%
Marion 10/10 6230 days 26%
Maria Fahlander 7/10 6240 days 22%
Ellie 10/10 6243 days 26%
Sanne 8/10 6243 days 25%
Claire Masling 8/10 6250 days 25%
Sally and David Wallis 9/10 6250 days 26%
Jody 9/10 6262 days 26%
Eliase 7/10 6264 days 22%
Vicki Cook 9/10 6277 days 26%
Carola Haaparinne 10/10 6278 days 26%
Wayne Best 10/10 6286 days 26%
Martin Wright 10/10 6298 days 26%
Floren 9/10 6339 days 26%
Sebastian 8/10 6568 days 25%
Tracy 10/10 6613 days 26%
Jacobien 10/10 6620 days 26%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Swimming with Dolphins experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.63% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 62 days. However the Swimming with Dolphins experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Swimming with Dolphins experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.57%
198 -3.59%
199 -3.61%
200 -3.63%
201 -3.64%
202 -3.66%
203 -3.68%

Balancing Adjustment

2.19% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.