Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Swimming with Dolphins.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Swimming with Dolphins

Valid Reviews

60 Valid Reviews

The Swimming with Dolphins experience has a total of 61 reviews. There are 60 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 60 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 23
38%
9/10 12
20%
8/10 12
20%
7/10 10
17%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.67% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Swimming with Dolphins valid reviews is 86.67% and is based on 60 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

53 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 60 valid reviews, the experience has 53 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 18
34%
9/10 11
21%
8/10 12
23%
7/10 9
17%
6/10 2
4%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.66% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Swimming with Dolphins face-to-face reviews is 85.66% and is based on 53 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

86.15%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Isabel 4/10 3134 days 64%
Alix 10/10 3137 days 100%
Claire 10/10 3137 days 100%
Lena 7/10 3177 days 90%
Stefano 8/10 3204 days 93%
Ivan Dupont 7/10 3208 days 87%
Max Backelandt 7/10 3877 days 36%
Marie Toulemonde 8/10 3877 days 38%
Annika Marz 7/10 3890 days 35%
Julian Zeissler 7/10 3890 days 35%
Lena Hanhart 7/10 3895 days 34%
Barbara 10/10 3913 days 36%
Mark and Eefie 9/10 4338 days 0%
Nigel Leighton 10/10 4341 days 0%
Laura Diepeveen 8/10 4633 days 38%
Stam 8/10 4639 days 38%
cpope 10/10 4688 days 39%
Naomi Kosteaman 9/10 4998 days 39%
Samuel Prechel 9/10 5014 days 39%
Niels Van Welsenes 10/10 5022 days 39%
salsnz 10/10 5298 days 39%
Jvjm Family 6/10 5347 days 33%
Sinjc Grude 8/10 5384 days 38%
Rachel & Barak 9/10 5385 days 39%
Jeremy & Sarah Rind 10/10 5386 days 39%
Andreas Sterki 8/10 5457 days 38%
Gina Swindells 10/10 5460 days 39%
bogaard 9/10 5575 days 39%
Amy_B 10/10 5681 days 39%
NancyB 9/10 5681 days 39%
TraceyM 8/10 5681 days 38%
DanielGermany 6/10 5686 days 33%
AndreaT 10/10 5689 days 39%
Sue Green 10/10 5693 days 39%
Greg18 7/10 5693 days 36%
DavidJ 8/10 5699 days 38%
Stolz 10/10 5716 days 39%
LindaV 7/10 5727 days 36%
Ian 10/10 5741 days 39%
HelenUK 8/10 5743 days 38%
enthusejohn 10/10 5743 days 39%
Camilla E 9/10 5748 days 39%
Zoe Summers 10/10 5905 days 39%
Benjamin Throk 9/10 6072 days 39%
Marion 10/10 6073 days 39%
Maria Fahlander 7/10 6083 days 36%
Ellie 10/10 6086 days 39%
Sanne 8/10 6086 days 38%
Claire Masling 8/10 6093 days 38%
Sally and David Wallis 9/10 6093 days 39%
Jody 9/10 6105 days 39%
Eliase 7/10 6107 days 36%
Vicki Cook 9/10 6120 days 39%
Carola Haaparinne 10/10 6121 days 39%
Wayne Best 10/10 6129 days 39%
Martin Wright 10/10 6141 days 39%
Floren 9/10 6182 days 39%
Sebastian 8/10 6411 days 38%
Tracy 10/10 6456 days 39%
Jacobien 10/10 6463 days 39%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Swimming with Dolphins experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.87% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 50 days. However the Swimming with Dolphins experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Swimming with Dolphins experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.81%
198 -3.83%
199 -3.85%
200 -3.87%
201 -3.89%
202 -3.91%
203 -3.93%

Balancing Adjustment

2.41% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.