Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Swimming with Dolphins.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Swimming with Dolphins

Valid Reviews

60 Valid Reviews

The Swimming with Dolphins experience has a total of 61 reviews. There are 60 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 60 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 23
38%
9/10 12
20%
8/10 12
20%
7/10 10
17%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.67% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Swimming with Dolphins valid reviews is 86.67% and is based on 60 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

53 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 60 valid reviews, the experience has 53 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 18
34%
9/10 11
21%
8/10 12
23%
7/10 9
17%
6/10 2
4%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.66% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Swimming with Dolphins face-to-face reviews is 85.66% and is based on 53 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

86.55%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Isabel 4/10 3189 days 48%
Alix 10/10 3192 days 100%
Claire 10/10 3192 days 100%
Lena 7/10 3232 days 85%
Stefano 8/10 3259 days 89%
Ivan Dupont 7/10 3263 days 81%
Max Backelandt 7/10 3932 days 2%
Marie Toulemonde 8/10 3932 days 5%
Annika Marz 7/10 3945 days 1%
Julian Zeissler 7/10 3945 days 1%
Lena Hanhart 7/10 3950 days 0%
Barbara 10/10 3968 days 1%
Mark and Eefie 9/10 4393 days 13%
Nigel Leighton 10/10 4396 days 14%
Laura Diepeveen 8/10 4688 days 13%
Stam 8/10 4694 days 13%
cpope 10/10 4743 days 14%
Naomi Kosteaman 9/10 5053 days 13%
Samuel Prechel 9/10 5069 days 13%
Niels Van Welsenes 10/10 5077 days 14%
salsnz 10/10 5353 days 14%
Jvjm Family 6/10 5402 days 5%
Sinjc Grude 8/10 5439 days 13%
Rachel & Barak 9/10 5440 days 13%
Jeremy & Sarah Rind 10/10 5441 days 14%
Andreas Sterki 8/10 5512 days 13%
Gina Swindells 10/10 5515 days 14%
bogaard 9/10 5630 days 13%
Amy_B 10/10 5736 days 14%
NancyB 9/10 5736 days 13%
TraceyM 8/10 5736 days 13%
DanielGermany 6/10 5741 days 5%
AndreaT 10/10 5744 days 14%
Sue Green 10/10 5748 days 14%
Greg18 7/10 5748 days 10%
DavidJ 8/10 5754 days 13%
Stolz 10/10 5771 days 14%
LindaV 7/10 5782 days 10%
Ian 10/10 5796 days 14%
HelenUK 8/10 5798 days 13%
enthusejohn 10/10 5798 days 14%
Camilla E 9/10 5803 days 13%
Zoe Summers 10/10 5960 days 14%
Benjamin Throk 9/10 6127 days 13%
Marion 10/10 6128 days 14%
Maria Fahlander 7/10 6138 days 10%
Ellie 10/10 6141 days 14%
Sanne 8/10 6141 days 13%
Claire Masling 8/10 6148 days 13%
Sally and David Wallis 9/10 6148 days 13%
Jody 9/10 6160 days 13%
Eliase 7/10 6162 days 10%
Vicki Cook 9/10 6175 days 13%
Carola Haaparinne 10/10 6176 days 14%
Wayne Best 10/10 6184 days 14%
Martin Wright 10/10 6196 days 14%
Floren 9/10 6237 days 13%
Sebastian 8/10 6466 days 13%
Tracy 10/10 6511 days 14%
Jacobien 10/10 6518 days 14%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Swimming with Dolphins experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.02% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Swimming with Dolphins experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Swimming with Dolphins experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.96%
198 -3.98%
199 -4.00%
200 -4.02%
201 -4.04%
202 -4.06%
203 -4.08%

Balancing Adjustment

2.35% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.