Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
225 Valid Reviews
The Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK experience has a total of 226 reviews. There are 225 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 225 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 73 |
|
32% |
9/10 | 72 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 59 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 16 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK valid reviews is 88.18% and is based on 225 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
209 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 225 valid reviews, the experience has 209 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 209 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 64 |
|
31% |
9/10 | 68 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 58 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 16 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.09% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK face-to-face reviews is 88.09% and is based on 209 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.02%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Hannah Campbell | 10/10 | 1514 days | 100% |
Harriet Smith | 9/10 | 2960 days | 26% |
Anna Wooster | 8/10 | 2998 days | 25% |
Theo Macer | 10/10 | 2999 days | 26% |
Alex | 9/10 | 3033 days | 25% |
Patrick | 8/10 | 3038 days | 24% |
Bob | 8/10 | 3041 days | 24% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 3049 days | 24% |
Nolwen | 9/10 | 3058 days | 24% |
Cassandra Geyer | 10/10 | 3282 days | 20% |
Sophia and Karen | 10/10 | 3294 days | 20% |
gonzalo caldiz | 9/10 | 3301 days | 20% |
Johannes Frank | 10/10 | 3309 days | 20% |
Nancy Logan | 8/10 | 3316 days | 19% |
Sophie Kalnymsky | 9/10 | 3333 days | 19% |
Henry Wichler | 9/10 | 3342 days | 19% |
Leo James | 8/10 | 3358 days | 19% |
Philip | 10/10 | 3359 days | 19% |
Ulrich Rix | 9/10 | 3371 days | 19% |
Joshua Hortkorn | 7/10 | 3384 days | 17% |
Daria and Annika | 8/10 | 3384 days | 18% |
Anais Boileau | 8/10 | 3386 days | 18% |
Sammy Cronin | 10/10 | 3403 days | 18% |
Selma Krap | 8/10 | 3405 days | 18% |
Martha Taatz | 10/10 | 3712 days | 12% |
Liz and Alan Weathers | 9/10 | 3715 days | 12% |
Jakub Stastny | 7/10 | 4013 days | 6% |
Chris Handley | 8/10 | 4039 days | 6% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 10/10 | 4043 days | 6% |
Ann Winter | 9/10 | 4061 days | 6% |
Phillip | 9/10 | 4061 days | 6% |
Vincent Schaeflier | 9/10 | 4069 days | 6% |
Camille Gagnant | 10/10 | 4092 days | 5% |
Anne Collet | 9/10 | 4095 days | 5% |
Mark Wiggington | 9/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
Nina Coopmans | 8/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
Rey Germain | 8/10 | 4384 days | 9% |
Yu-Ti Chu | 10/10 | 4399 days | 9% |
Ton Martens | 10/10 | 4399 days | 9% |
Sebastian | 10/10 | 4412 days | 9% |
Constanze | 9/10 | 4412 days | 9% |
Andre and Marina | 8/10 | 4441 days | 9% |
Julien Bocherens | 10/10 | 4484 days | 9% |
Sharon Yates | 10/10 | 4486 days | 9% |
Stefan and Brigit and Janek | 9/10 | 4490 days | 9% |
Oliver Kalmbach | 9/10 | 4507 days | 9% |
Pietersen | 8/10 | 4509 days | 9% |
Martina Posch | 10/10 | 4512 days | 9% |
Anna Gottsch | 10/10 | 4513 days | 9% |
Anna | 10/10 | 4740 days | 9% |
Monika Kneidl | 10/10 | 4748 days | 9% |
Jessica Tilly | 10/10 | 4748 days | 9% |
Moss | 9/10 | 4758 days | 9% |
Jill Homewood | 9/10 | 4766 days | 9% |
Olivia Reiter | 10/10 | 4766 days | 9% |
Ruth Har | 9/10 | 4767 days | 9% |
Mike Wright | 10/10 | 4767 days | 9% |
Ed Trucie | 10/10 | 4768 days | 9% |
M Robinson | 8/10 | 4769 days | 9% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4769 days | 9% |
Melanie Friessen | 8/10 | 4775 days | 9% |
Jochem Snyders | 9/10 | 4776 days | 9% |
James Buryson | 7/10 | 4784 days | 9% |
Johanna & Catrin | 8/10 | 4785 days | 9% |
Susanne MacGyver | 7/10 | 4785 days | 9% |
Sandra Andersen | 9/10 | 4785 days | 9% |
Deana Peters | 8/10 | 4785 days | 9% |
Tom Pratt | 7/10 | 4785 days | 9% |
Rob Gill | 10/10 | 4786 days | 9% |
Elise Violet | 8/10 | 4786 days | 9% |
Walter & Heidi Baumann | 8/10 | 4787 days | 9% |
Hendrik F | 9/10 | 4787 days | 9% |
Emily Wikston | 9/10 | 4788 days | 9% |
Nikki Bentley | 9/10 | 4788 days | 9% |
Siegfried Krueger | 10/10 | 4789 days | 9% |
Janet | 10/10 | 4802 days | 9% |
CMJ | 9/10 | 4833 days | 9% |
Julia Edman | 8/10 | 4847 days | 9% |
Sarah Graham | 10/10 | 4880 days | 9% |
Laura McCusker | 9/10 | 4880 days | 9% |
Melanie Wood | 8/10 | 4880 days | 9% |
J Bliss | 8/10 | 4894 days | 9% |
Jack Potman | 8/10 | 5096 days | 9% |
Lennart Lundberg | 10/10 | 5110 days | 9% |
Katy Johnson | 8/10 | 5114 days | 9% |
Iain Campbell | 8/10 | 5117 days | 9% |
Susannah Eduart | 10/10 | 5119 days | 9% |
Patrick Gloede | 9/10 | 5122 days | 9% |
Daniel Kriecht | 10/10 | 5122 days | 9% |
Marian | 9/10 | 5125 days | 9% |
Marquardt and Bernd | 10/10 | 5125 days | 9% |
Thorsten Grocholl | 9/10 | 5126 days | 9% |
Cory Wornell | 9/10 | 5128 days | 9% |
W Groshops | 9/10 | 5128 days | 9% |
Aimee Pollett | 8/10 | 5129 days | 9% |
John Mayer | 8/10 | 5129 days | 9% |
Mr Stanley and Miss Christy | 10/10 | 5129 days | 9% |
Marty Fey | 10/10 | 5130 days | 9% |
Tricia Goggin | 9/10 | 5131 days | 9% |
Jim & Suzy Ducker | 9/10 | 5132 days | 9% |
Niklas Ronnino | 8/10 | 5137 days | 9% |
Sue Hickman | 10/10 | 5137 days | 9% |
Silvia Schmutz | 10/10 | 5139 days | 9% |
Andreas Fritesche | 8/10 | 5142 days | 9% |
Annelie & Martin | 10/10 | 5143 days | 9% |
Ursula Scherch | 9/10 | 5143 days | 9% |
Alexander & Stephanie | 8/10 | 5144 days | 9% |
J Holden | 9/10 | 5145 days | 9% |
Mr and Mrs Lambert | 10/10 | 5146 days | 9% |
Jean-Francois Guilbault | 9/10 | 5152 days | 9% |
Amanda Wallace | 9/10 | 5157 days | 9% |
Diana Clipsham | 8/10 | 5158 days | 9% |
J Thorn | 10/10 | 5158 days | 9% |
Daniel Bogdanowitsch | 10/10 | 5158 days | 9% |
E M Klap | 8/10 | 5158 days | 9% |
Sandra Schneifer | 9/10 | 5158 days | 9% |
John Balson | 10/10 | 5159 days | 9% |
Mark Robinson | 10/10 | 5159 days | 9% |
Gillian de Vries | 9/10 | 5160 days | 9% |
Hemi Stein | 10/10 | 5161 days | 9% |
C Gobl | 8/10 | 5166 days | 9% |
Moniek Steyaert | 8/10 | 5167 days | 9% |
Remke | 2/10 | 5168 days | 4% |
aggiemary04 | 10/10 | 5290 days | 9% |
Bjorn Sall | 8/10 | 5485 days | 9% |
Benedict Fluthman | 6/10 | 5494 days | 8% |
Peter Schmidt | 5/10 | 5504 days | 7% |
Leonard Vans | 7/10 | 5504 days | 9% |
Matthias A | 9/10 | 5506 days | 9% |
Barbara & Sven | 9/10 | 5506 days | 9% |
Jonathan Martin | 9/10 | 5507 days | 9% |
Jan Kuenzel | 10/10 | 5510 days | 9% |
Evelien Thijs | 8/10 | 5511 days | 9% |
Mark | 8/10 | 5512 days | 9% |
Hans & Huxi | 8/10 | 5512 days | 9% |
John Mathers | 10/10 | 5513 days | 9% |
S Bourford | 9/10 | 5513 days | 9% |
Heike Pless | 10/10 | 5513 days | 9% |
Henrik Plichta | 9/10 | 5513 days | 9% |
Peter Koeck | 10/10 | 5513 days | 9% |
Roger Trusedale | 9/10 | 5514 days | 9% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5517 days | 9% |
Tim Stick | 8/10 | 5518 days | 9% |
David Hobson | 9/10 | 5524 days | 9% |
Nikki Wood | 9/10 | 5526 days | 9% |
van der Wakker | 8/10 | 5527 days | 9% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5532 days | 9% |
Alain Deslandres | 8/10 | 5545 days | 9% |
Honeymooners | 4/10 | 5563 days | 6% |
balthes | 7/10 | 5577 days | 9% |
eliertv | 7/10 | 5578 days | 9% |
gabei | 9/10 | 5578 days | 9% |
marcol | 10/10 | 5579 days | 9% |
florian | 9/10 | 5579 days | 9% |
mariak | 7/10 | 5580 days | 9% |
Steffi Marco | 10/10 | 5598 days | 9% |
Stephanie Steiner | 8/10 | 5598 days | 9% |
Bert Wierzy | 7/10 | 5601 days | 9% |
Sarah Goeckener | 7/10 | 5604 days | 9% |
Zach | 9/10 | 5604 days | 9% |
katharina | 7/10 | 5604 days | 9% |
Bushbeck | 10/10 | 5604 days | 9% |
bdevries | 9/10 | 5605 days | 9% |
Stefanie Micheler | 10/10 | 5605 days | 9% |
Vanessa | 9/10 | 5605 days | 9% |
Gina Swindells | 10/10 | 5605 days | 9% |
Elodie | 8/10 | 5605 days | 9% |
MV Vroenhoven | 8/10 | 5609 days | 9% |
Karen Fisher | 10/10 | 5620 days | 9% |
Dimitry Zonnet | 9/10 | 5620 days | 9% |
jmulrooney | 10/10 | 5624 days | 9% |
Francesca | 8/10 | 5639 days | 9% |
G Miller | 10/10 | 5685 days | 9% |
muriellef | 9/10 | 5720 days | 9% |
Andrea | 8/10 | 5758 days | 9% |
KimC | 8/10 | 5826 days | 9% |
BVanW | 9/10 | 5830 days | 9% |
VirginiaR | 10/10 | 5830 days | 9% |
AndrewL1 | 8/10 | 5830 days | 9% |
HansH1 | 9/10 | 5833 days | 9% |
Lisa Duin | 7/10 | 5836 days | 9% |
Lucia Vontobel | 9/10 | 5836 days | 9% |
LaurensD | 8/10 | 5838 days | 9% |
Jan | 9/10 | 5855 days | 9% |
JohannaB | 9/10 | 5857 days | 9% |
Viola | 9/10 | 5857 days | 9% |
Elinor Wajngot | 10/10 | 5860 days | 9% |
Hannes Ockerman | 7/10 | 5861 days | 9% |
FrasorK | 9/10 | 5871 days | 9% |
HelenAustralia | 9/10 | 5871 days | 9% |
JuliaG1 | 9/10 | 5871 days | 9% |
Douglas | 8/10 | 5879 days | 9% |
Eugene | 9/10 | 5879 days | 9% |
InkenGermany | 10/10 | 5880 days | 9% |
ralphl | 7/10 | 5882 days | 9% |
Chris | 9/10 | 5905 days | 9% |
Denis | 10/10 | 5907 days | 9% |
Andie | 8/10 | 5910 days | 9% |
Erik | 9/10 | 5910 days | 9% |
George | 10/10 | 5914 days | 9% |
Miranda | 8/10 | 5914 days | 9% |
Sandy | 9/10 | 5914 days | 9% |
Emory | 9/10 | 5922 days | 9% |
Patrick | 10/10 | 5959 days | 9% |
Lucy | 9/10 | 5968 days | 9% |
Masako | 10/10 | 5972 days | 9% |
NeeleO | 8/10 | 5989 days | 9% |
mark_mientjes | 10/10 | 6001 days | 9% |
Tom van Ommen | 10/10 | 6001 days | 9% |
Nathan | 10/10 | 6010 days | 9% |
Sune | 9/10 | 6027 days | 9% |
Allison Hosley | 10/10 | 6037 days | 9% |
Brent Scanlan | 10/10 | 6180 days | 9% |
Marian Mckinney | 5/10 | 6231 days | 7% |
Steven | 8/10 | 6235 days | 9% |
Brendan Marshall | 9/10 | 6243 days | 9% |
Damien Marshall | 8/10 | 6243 days | 9% |
Roman | 7/10 | 6249 days | 9% |
ranker_851 | 9/10 | 6249 days | 9% |
Vaclaf | 8/10 | 6249 days | 9% |
Alex | 10/10 | 6266 days | 9% |
Anneli | 8/10 | 6286 days | 9% |
Shelley | 10/10 | 6545 days | 9% |
John | 10/10 | 6568 days | 9% |
Jonas | 8/10 | 6573 days | 9% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.84% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 59 days. However the Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Marahau Sea Kayaks / MSK experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.78% |
198 | -3.80% |
199 | -3.82% |
200 | -3.84% |
201 | -3.86% |
202 | -3.88% |
203 | -3.90% |
… | … |
1.79% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.