Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kaiteriteri Kayaks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
173 Valid Reviews
The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has a total of 173 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 173 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 43 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 51 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 19 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.07% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaiteriteri Kayaks valid reviews is 86.07% and is based on 173 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
153 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 173 valid reviews, the experience has 153 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 153 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 34 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 18 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kaiteriteri Kayaks face-to-face reviews is 85.29% and is based on 153 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
87.49%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holger Voland | 10/10 | 2202 days | 100% |
| Renault Margaux | 10/10 | 2231 days | 98% |
| Christian Chalupny | 10/10 | 2292 days | 95% |
| Regina85 | 10/10 | 2323 days | 93% |
| Inga Hoffmann | 9/10 | 2596 days | 77% |
| S Weslake | 9/10 | 2933 days | 58% |
| Martina Winkel | 10/10 | 2933 days | 59% |
| Wouter Bleckmann | 9/10 | 3376 days | 34% |
| Gordon Todan | 8/10 | 3425 days | 31% |
| Carlos Castro | 10/10 | 3478 days | 29% |
| Jorge Anderson | 8/10 | 3636 days | 19% |
| Adele Jacques | 8/10 | 3647 days | 18% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3709 days | 15% |
| Aline Jimenez | 9/10 | 3749 days | 13% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 4396 days | 6% |
| Michael Steimel | 9/10 | 4404 days | 7% |
| Isabelle Bohle | 9/10 | 4404 days | 7% |
| Max Meternich | 9/10 | 4408 days | 7% |
| Shay S | 9/10 | 4422 days | 7% |
| Laura Pleumeekers | 8/10 | 4439 days | 6% |
| Pioter Jurkowski | 10/10 | 4453 days | 7% |
| Sharron Berry | 9/10 | 4818 days | 7% |
| Christian | 9/10 | 4831 days | 7% |
| Alison Langley | 9/10 | 4831 days | 7% |
| Ingrid | 10/10 | 4831 days | 7% |
| Jolien | 8/10 | 4860 days | 6% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 4860 days | 6% |
| David Prendergast | 8/10 | 5105 days | 6% |
| Green UK | 8/10 | 5105 days | 6% |
| Carly Braddock | 8/10 | 5113 days | 6% |
| Sandra Dirk | 9/10 | 5116 days | 7% |
| Peter Adams | 8/10 | 5118 days | 6% |
| Def Fem | 8/10 | 5119 days | 6% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5120 days | 6% |
| Erik | 10/10 | 5126 days | 7% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 5129 days | 6% |
| Martin & Dee Bellarby | 10/10 | 5134 days | 7% |
| Andrea Bircher | 7/10 | 5138 days | 5% |
| Andreas Kofod-Hansen | 9/10 | 5138 days | 7% |
| Astrid Boon | 8/10 | 5138 days | 6% |
| Judith Fowler | 8/10 | 5139 days | 6% |
| M Neuman | 6/10 | 5145 days | 3% |
| Bethany Hamilton | 8/10 | 5152 days | 6% |
| Mark & Beth Kaufman | 9/10 | 5219 days | 7% |
| Paul | 8/10 | 5222 days | 6% |
| Christoph | 9/10 | 5224 days | 7% |
| Natascha & Greg | 10/10 | 5227 days | 7% |
| Janet Arber | 9/10 | 5440 days | 7% |
| Florian Miller | 10/10 | 5473 days | 7% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5476 days | 7% |
| Johannes Klein | 10/10 | 5482 days | 7% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5483 days | 5% |
| K Dahmer | 10/10 | 5483 days | 7% |
| Jade & Henry | 10/10 | 5488 days | 7% |
| rickweldon | 10/10 | 5490 days | 7% |
| Jarrett King | 9/10 | 5491 days | 7% |
| Marco Schoeggl | 7/10 | 5492 days | 5% |
| Ross Salisbury | 10/10 | 5492 days | 7% |
| Tamara Clark | 7/10 | 5493 days | 5% |
| Callum Sibbald | 8/10 | 5494 days | 6% |
| Daniel Hammersley | 10/10 | 5495 days | 7% |
| Manuela Manns | 8/10 | 5503 days | 6% |
| Becky Foley | 9/10 | 5504 days | 7% |
| Dave and Emma | 8/10 | 5506 days | 6% |
| David and Wendy Lucas | 10/10 | 5507 days | 7% |
| Jessie Currie | 9/10 | 5509 days | 7% |
| Mark Roelofs | 7/10 | 5509 days | 5% |
| Trov & Liz Warren | 10/10 | 5510 days | 7% |
| Christina Fischer | 10/10 | 5513 days | 7% |
| Jensen | 9/10 | 5515 days | 7% |
| Isbabel | 10/10 | 5516 days | 7% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5832 days | 6% |
| Birgit Farwig | 10/10 | 5836 days | 7% |
| Family_Thomsen | 9/10 | 5837 days | 7% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 10/10 | 5841 days | 7% |
| Andy & Louise Dutton | 9/10 | 5842 days | 7% |
| Margo Alaska | 9/10 | 5846 days | 7% |
| Matilda Hansson | 8/10 | 5846 days | 6% |
| Teresa Gizzi | 8/10 | 5848 days | 6% |
| Brian_Val | 8/10 | 5858 days | 6% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 5858 days | 5% |
| Mike Brunt | 9/10 | 5863 days | 7% |
| Lousie Hug | 5/10 | 5869 days | 0% |
| Marco | 7/10 | 5871 days | 5% |
| Radek Hoferek | 10/10 | 5879 days | 7% |
| Wagner | 8/10 | 5880 days | 6% |
| Lisa Huet | 9/10 | 5914 days | 7% |
| Katie Morrow | 9/10 | 5914 days | 7% |
| rowan bryant | 8/10 | 5928 days | 6% |
| stevnba | 8/10 | 5930 days | 6% |
| stefanz | 10/10 | 5930 days | 7% |
| carmenk | 7/10 | 5931 days | 5% |
| andres | 10/10 | 5937 days | 7% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 5937 days | 6% |
| selinab | 8/10 | 5938 days | 6% |
| Christian Jean Louis | 9/10 | 5947 days | 7% |
| vernenal | 10/10 | 5949 days | 7% |
| Kirsty McGrath | 7/10 | 5949 days | 5% |
| Dan Mair | 7/10 | 5956 days | 5% |
| Bart en Mirjam | 8/10 | 5957 days | 6% |
| Ritag | 9/10 | 6061 days | 7% |
| Russ C | 9/10 | 6189 days | 7% |
| jenniferk | 8/10 | 6189 days | 6% |
| Clem | 8/10 | 6194 days | 6% |
| AnjaN | 10/10 | 6196 days | 7% |
| ClodaghM | 9/10 | 6206 days | 7% |
| Hans | 8/10 | 6206 days | 6% |
| Andrew Wilson | 9/10 | 6206 days | 7% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6209 days | 6% |
| Maria | 7/10 | 6212 days | 5% |
| Wouter Muller | 8/10 | 6212 days | 6% |
| Krapels | 7/10 | 6213 days | 5% |
| Sam Marshall | 7/10 | 6217 days | 5% |
| Johannes Kerner | 6/10 | 6220 days | 3% |
| lannie | 8/10 | 6222 days | 6% |
| VictoriaH | 7/10 | 6224 days | 5% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 6224 days | 6% |
| GaryW | 7/10 | 6224 days | 5% |
| Carmel | 6/10 | 6229 days | 3% |
| Raphaelle | 10/10 | 6232 days | 7% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 6253 days | 7% |
| Nick Wilkinson | 9/10 | 6272 days | 7% |
| Jeanpierre | 10/10 | 6302 days | 7% |
| Pieter | 9/10 | 6310 days | 7% |
| Brent | 9/10 | 6379 days | 7% |
| Trina | 8/10 | 6413 days | 6% |
| Bex | 10/10 | 6421 days | 7% |
| Gorka Rojas | 6/10 | 6461 days | 3% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 6566 days | 6% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 6566 days | 6% |
| Jason Page | 7/10 | 6569 days | 5% |
| Beate Sinn | 10/10 | 6573 days | 7% |
| Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6581 days | 7% |
| Ortved | 8/10 | 6586 days | 6% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 6588 days | 7% |
| Roger and Heather Smith | 10/10 | 6594 days | 7% |
| Celine | 8/10 | 6598 days | 6% |
| Timothy | 10/10 | 6635 days | 7% |
| Kara Della Groce | 10/10 | 6635 days | 7% |
| Christian Arnot | 8/10 | 6658 days | 6% |
| Anita | 9/10 | 6658 days | 7% |
| Stu Cutler | 9/10 | 6664 days | 7% |
| Ewen Maclean | 10/10 | 6664 days | 7% |
| Hendrich | 8/10 | 6664 days | 6% |
| Neil Cooke | 7/10 | 6671 days | 5% |
| ElasticLink | 9/10 | 6686 days | 7% |
| Nick Bailey | 8/10 | 6756 days | 6% |
| ranker_43 | 10/10 | 6791 days | 7% |
| Alan | 9/10 | 6900 days | 7% |
| jonas | 9/10 | 6915 days | 7% |
| MrsWesley | 8/10 | 6916 days | 6% |
| Franz | 9/10 | 6917 days | 7% |
| Uri | 9/10 | 6919 days | 7% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 6925 days | 7% |
| Chris | 9/10 | 6926 days | 7% |
| M Bekker | 8/10 | 6931 days | 6% |
| ErikVanDam | 8/10 | 6945 days | 6% |
| Sharon | 10/10 | 6948 days | 7% |
| Bill | 9/10 | 6952 days | 7% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 6954 days | 7% |
| John | 6/10 | 6954 days | 3% |
| Yasmin Michael | 9/10 | 6955 days | 7% |
| Caroline | 8/10 | 6965 days | 6% |
| Camilla | 8/10 | 6965 days | 6% |
| Hanna | 9/10 | 6967 days | 7% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 6967 days | 7% |
| ErikSmith | 8/10 | 6967 days | 6% |
| KikiNelissen | 9/10 | 6967 days | 7% |
| Lyndsey | 7/10 | 6967 days | 5% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 6972 days | 7% |
| AmyBarnett | 8/10 | 6978 days | 6% |
| ranker_428 | 7/10 | 6978 days | 5% |
| mishasan | 10/10 | 8502 days | 7% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.02% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kaiteriteri Kayaks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.96% |
| 198 | -3.98% |
| 199 | -4.00% |
| 200 | -4.02% |
| 201 | -4.04% |
| 202 | -4.06% |
| 203 | -4.08% |
| … | … |
2.14% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.