Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kahu Kayaks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
223 Valid Reviews
The Kahu Kayaks experience has a total of 224 reviews. There are 223 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 223 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 112 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 62 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.93% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kahu Kayaks valid reviews is 91.93% and is based on 223 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
174 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 223 valid reviews, the experience has 174 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 174 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 74 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 55 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 33 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kahu Kayaks face-to-face reviews is 90.57% and is based on 174 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.99%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kara | 10/10 | 1387 days | 100% |
| Seaghan & Dune | 10/10 | 1477 days | 75% |
| Pat Burns | 10/10 | 2514 days | 23% |
| Sabine Gauss | 9/10 | 3237 days | 14% |
| Rashi Birla | 10/10 | 3257 days | 13% |
| Alex Patteron | 10/10 | 3297 days | 13% |
| Marcel Felder | 10/10 | 3333 days | 13% |
| Tom Rogers | 8/10 | 3336 days | 12% |
| Olde Vogel | 8/10 | 3336 days | 12% |
| Lieke vol Velde | 9/10 | 3336 days | 12% |
| Katharina | 8/10 | 3341 days | 12% |
| Eurard Achille | 8/10 | 3349 days | 12% |
| Nickolas Jonkergouw | 9/10 | 3365 days | 12% |
| Miriam Gamble | 9/10 | 3380 days | 12% |
| Michelle O'Regen | 10/10 | 3577 days | 10% |
| Dahlia Ahmed | 9/10 | 3600 days | 9% |
| Lee Sandberg | 10/10 | 3627 days | 9% |
| Tina Rust | 10/10 | 3628 days | 9% |
| Alice and James | 7/10 | 3646 days | 8% |
| Chloe Guerillot | 6/10 | 3651 days | 7% |
| Christopher Rotsch | 8/10 | 3685 days | 8% |
| Tarillon Family | 7/10 | 3965 days | 4% |
| Charles Aubry | 9/10 | 3997 days | 4% |
| Arvid Hellquist | 9/10 | 4007 days | 4% |
| Damaris Mayer | 8/10 | 4014 days | 4% |
| David and Stephan | 10/10 | 4044 days | 4% |
| Devan Sheppard | 9/10 | 4062 days | 4% |
| Christina | 7/10 | 4322 days | 0% |
| Kathrin Lerch | 10/10 | 4322 days | 0% |
| Erik Nestlez | 10/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
| Nina Helmling | 8/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Steffen | 9/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 4352 days | 0% |
| Marinette | 8/10 | 4352 days | 0% |
| Luca Scheuemeier | 10/10 | 4352 days | 0% |
| Kristina | 8/10 | 4383 days | 6% |
| Volker | 8/10 | 4383 days | 6% |
| jonas meier | 9/10 | 4404 days | 6% |
| Romina Bolz | 8/10 | 4404 days | 6% |
| Paul Balfour | 8/10 | 4409 days | 6% |
| Eric and Nienke | 9/10 | 4430 days | 6% |
| Julie Hatch | 10/10 | 4491 days | 6% |
| Rampon | 9/10 | 4692 days | 6% |
| Debiesse | 10/10 | 4693 days | 6% |
| Hendrik Rother | 10/10 | 4696 days | 6% |
| Claire | 8/10 | 4705 days | 6% |
| Jana Simcikova | 10/10 | 4707 days | 6% |
| Fabian Koitka | 9/10 | 4725 days | 6% |
| Michal Maly | 8/10 | 4731 days | 6% |
| JohnHyde | 10/10 | 4764 days | 6% |
| Aurelie Morin | 7/10 | 4786 days | 6% |
| Natalie Nubler | 10/10 | 4787 days | 6% |
| Anne Sutkowi | 7/10 | 4795 days | 6% |
| Sasha and Sandra Bonavia | 9/10 | 4795 days | 6% |
| Erik Funk | 9/10 | 4802 days | 6% |
| Harald Prinz | 8/10 | 4806 days | 6% |
| James Darren Tennant | 10/10 | 4807 days | 6% |
| scoopy | 10/10 | 5039 days | 6% |
| Goran Backlund | 9/10 | 5055 days | 6% |
| Tinne Cis | 6/10 | 5067 days | 5% |
| Richard and Janet | 10/10 | 5073 days | 6% |
| Michael Jefferies | 10/10 | 5073 days | 6% |
| Harald | 10/10 | 5079 days | 6% |
| Anne King | 9/10 | 5079 days | 6% |
| Matt Kelley | 9/10 | 5079 days | 6% |
| Lotte Zwail | 9/10 | 5079 days | 6% |
| Hannah Bean | 8/10 | 5081 days | 6% |
| Mike & Jennie | 9/10 | 5081 days | 6% |
| Mike & Mandy | 8/10 | 5081 days | 6% |
| pamr | 8/10 | 5083 days | 6% |
| Villa | 9/10 | 5084 days | 6% |
| Richard Spandonk | 8/10 | 5087 days | 6% |
| Franziska & Katrin | 10/10 | 5091 days | 6% |
| Clemens | 10/10 | 5092 days | 6% |
| Devon Urlacher | 8/10 | 5093 days | 6% |
| Thomas Krause | 8/10 | 5093 days | 6% |
| Lilja Bjork Hermannsdottir | 7/10 | 5098 days | 6% |
| Remy van Heugten | 8/10 | 5098 days | 6% |
| Keith_W | 10/10 | 5099 days | 6% |
| Annika | 10/10 | 5099 days | 6% |
| ToGy | 8/10 | 5099 days | 6% |
| Alfred & Henrike | 10/10 | 5124 days | 6% |
| Barbsldh | 10/10 | 5130 days | 6% |
| Deirdre Hayes | 8/10 | 5167 days | 6% |
| Cornelia & Josef | 9/10 | 5173 days | 6% |
| Fran & Roger | 10/10 | 5178 days | 6% |
| Mark Bakker | 8/10 | 5178 days | 6% |
| Gert | 9/10 | 5191 days | 6% |
| katel86 | 10/10 | 5252 days | 6% |
| Martin Potter | 9/10 | 5403 days | 6% |
| Anezka Hlavacova | 9/10 | 5419 days | 6% |
| Dave Jones | 9/10 | 5420 days | 6% |
| Rolf | 8/10 | 5427 days | 6% |
| Wouter Moui | 9/10 | 5428 days | 6% |
| Canada | 10/10 | 5428 days | 6% |
| Michael Long | 10/10 | 5429 days | 6% |
| Beat & Connie | 10/10 | 5430 days | 6% |
| Jacob Nube | 9/10 | 5432 days | 6% |
| Andy Cameron-Daniels | 10/10 | 5434 days | 6% |
| khs | 9/10 | 5436 days | 6% |
| Ann Parry | 10/10 | 5440 days | 6% |
| Adam Hayley | 7/10 | 5448 days | 6% |
| Katie Nicol | 10/10 | 5449 days | 6% |
| Darren Bruestle | 9/10 | 5451 days | 6% |
| Tom | 9/10 | 5454 days | 6% |
| Russell Stevens | 8/10 | 5454 days | 6% |
| Philipp Rau | 9/10 | 5455 days | 6% |
| Luc Marchand | 10/10 | 5456 days | 6% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 5456 days | 6% |
| Leslie Aldridge | 10/10 | 5457 days | 6% |
| Jorgen vahl Rasmussen | 9/10 | 5457 days | 6% |
| pjfranke | 10/10 | 5464 days | 6% |
| Beate Godsk | 9/10 | 5464 days | 6% |
| Bunthorne | 10/10 | 5495 days | 6% |
| emthekiwi | 10/10 | 5587 days | 6% |
| Demmers | 10/10 | 5679 days | 6% |
| Phineas Smith-Fox | 9/10 | 5737 days | 6% |
| wilsoneng | 10/10 | 5770 days | 6% |
| Maria | 9/10 | 5770 days | 6% |
| Tim Smith | 10/10 | 5792 days | 6% |
| BenH | 10/10 | 5801 days | 6% |
| Flora | 10/10 | 5803 days | 6% |
| Vera Van Schie | 10/10 | 5809 days | 6% |
| Thomas K | 9/10 | 5810 days | 6% |
| Jannievan Osnabrugge | 10/10 | 5811 days | 6% |
| Helen B | 9/10 | 5811 days | 6% |
| Ferth | 10/10 | 5815 days | 6% |
| Roos | 9/10 | 5815 days | 6% |
| Klass | 9/10 | 5815 days | 6% |
| Hannah Clark | 10/10 | 5822 days | 6% |
| Ingrid Overes | 10/10 | 5828 days | 6% |
| Tracey Buschl | 10/10 | 5829 days | 6% |
| Mitchell Mapletree | 10/10 | 5845 days | 6% |
| Maki | 10/10 | 5860 days | 6% |
| nigelwaterhouse | 9/10 | 5860 days | 6% |
| Ed | 10/10 | 5860 days | 6% |
| Dogmatix | 10/10 | 5860 days | 6% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 5875 days | 6% |
| biene | 10/10 | 5875 days | 6% |
| Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5895 days | 6% |
| Karen Raven | 8/10 | 5898 days | 6% |
| Eimear Doyle | 10/10 | 5903 days | 6% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 5903 days | 6% |
| amzbellz | 10/10 | 5952 days | 6% |
| Kurt Smudzinski | 10/10 | 5982 days | 6% |
| bertel | 10/10 | 6018 days | 6% |
| desl | 10/10 | 6135 days | 6% |
| martinat | 10/10 | 6135 days | 6% |
| Van Lent | 8/10 | 6136 days | 6% |
| S Schlesinger | 10/10 | 6139 days | 6% |
| Andrew Smith | 9/10 | 6141 days | 6% |
| BevanLisa | 9/10 | 6152 days | 6% |
| Barry Smith | 9/10 | 6155 days | 6% |
| Mia | 10/10 | 6156 days | 6% |
| Soeren Rasmussen | 10/10 | 6157 days | 6% |
| eatc | 10/10 | 6166 days | 6% |
| A | 9/10 | 6166 days | 6% |
| Charles | 8/10 | 6167 days | 6% |
| Dalibor | 10/10 | 6169 days | 6% |
| ChristopherD | 8/10 | 6169 days | 6% |
| CarolB | 10/10 | 6169 days | 6% |
| Emma Louise | 9/10 | 6178 days | 6% |
| Christina | 8/10 | 6183 days | 6% |
| Rachel | 10/10 | 6184 days | 6% |
| AlastairP | 10/10 | 6192 days | 6% |
| mike smith | 10/10 | 6192 days | 6% |
| Caroline | 9/10 | 6192 days | 6% |
| Busson | 8/10 | 6197 days | 6% |
| Hans | 7/10 | 6199 days | 6% |
| Nicole | 10/10 | 6199 days | 6% |
| Tanja | 10/10 | 6199 days | 6% |
| Dianne | 9/10 | 6203 days | 6% |
| LeaM | 9/10 | 6205 days | 6% |
| AndreM | 10/10 | 6205 days | 6% |
| JohannesE | 7/10 | 6205 days | 6% |
| Bernd | 10/10 | 6205 days | 6% |
| KTinga | 9/10 | 6206 days | 6% |
| Lucas | 10/10 | 6207 days | 6% |
| Josefine | 10/10 | 6207 days | 6% |
| alex | 10/10 | 6207 days | 6% |
| Richard Rodd | 10/10 | 6213 days | 6% |
| rar | 10/10 | 6213 days | 6% |
| Melanie | 10/10 | 6215 days | 6% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 6239 days | 6% |
| Claire | 9/10 | 6247 days | 6% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 6255 days | 6% |
| Maureen | 10/10 | 6255 days | 6% |
| lming60 | 10/10 | 6260 days | 6% |
| peter_lowles | 10/10 | 6265 days | 6% |
| mike brett | 8/10 | 6269 days | 6% |
| RhysandSteffi | 10/10 | 6285 days | 6% |
| Paula Semmens | 9/10 | 6293 days | 6% |
| StephR | 10/10 | 6294 days | 6% |
| Rudolf Meredith | 10/10 | 6295 days | 6% |
| Max | 9/10 | 6370 days | 6% |
| Rhea | 9/10 | 6443 days | 6% |
| annemarie_and_markus | 10/10 | 6486 days | 6% |
| charlotte | 9/10 | 6507 days | 6% |
| jahirst | 10/10 | 6517 days | 6% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 6518 days | 6% |
| Barnie | 10/10 | 6521 days | 6% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 6521 days | 6% |
| Kolacny | 10/10 | 6521 days | 6% |
| Mie Toft Pedersen | 9/10 | 6531 days | 6% |
| Emily Houston | 10/10 | 6532 days | 6% |
| Dirk | 10/10 | 6534 days | 6% |
| Ian Ridgeway | 10/10 | 6536 days | 6% |
| Loodle | 9/10 | 6546 days | 6% |
| Zurcher Marco | 3/10 | 6562 days | 3% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6575 days | 6% |
| Hugh McCarthy | 6/10 | 6582 days | 5% |
| Tony and Ken | 10/10 | 6582 days | 6% |
| Anneli | 8/10 | 6583 days | 6% |
| holly parker | 10/10 | 6593 days | 6% |
| Vince | 10/10 | 6602 days | 6% |
| Lena | 10/10 | 6613 days | 6% |
| Carolr | 9/10 | 6624 days | 6% |
| MarkReid | 10/10 | 6825 days | 6% |
| Hazel | 9/10 | 6859 days | 6% |
| Magnus | 8/10 | 6865 days | 6% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6868 days | 6% |
| Heather | 10/10 | 6872 days | 6% |
| Jacob Mille | 10/10 | 6879 days | 6% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kahu Kayaks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.09% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 46 days. However the Kahu Kayaks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kahu Kayaks experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.03% |
| 198 | -4.05% |
| 199 | -4.07% |
| 200 | -4.09% |
| 201 | -4.11% |
| 202 | -4.13% |
| 203 | -4.15% |
| … | … |
1.15% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.