Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Wilsons Abel Tasman.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
243 Valid Reviews
The Wilsons Abel Tasman experience has a total of 243 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 243 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
20% |
9/10 | 54 |
|
22% |
8/10 | 76 |
|
31% |
7/10 | 31 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 18 |
|
7% |
5/10 | 6 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
80.62% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Wilsons Abel Tasman valid reviews is 80.62% and is based on 243 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
231 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 243 valid reviews, the experience has 231 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 231 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 45 |
|
19% |
9/10 | 50 |
|
22% |
8/10 | 75 |
|
32% |
7/10 | 29 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 18 |
|
8% |
5/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
80.52% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Wilsons Abel Tasman face-to-face reviews is 80.52% and is based on 231 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
82.49%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Han Li | 9/10 | 2973 days | 100% |
Alice Ormandy | 8/10 | 3000 days | 97% |
Sabine Schwandegger | 10/10 | 3060 days | 94% |
Matthew Long | 7/10 | 3061 days | 86% |
Patricia | 9/10 | 3298 days | 74% |
Silvia | 10/10 | 3308 days | 74% |
Jessica Mackie | 8/10 | 3324 days | 71% |
Ceri Eaton | 8/10 | 3327 days | 70% |
Stephan Friedrich | 9/10 | 3339 days | 70% |
Simon Striegel | 6/10 | 3359 days | 58% |
Sabine Bergen | 9/10 | 3364 days | 68% |
Darker | 9/10 | 3703 days | 41% |
James Betz | 8/10 | 4024 days | 14% |
Daniel Garcia Dezgado | 8/10 | 4062 days | 11% |
Nelle Dutilleur | 9/10 | 4099 days | 9% |
Mathias Butterlin | 10/10 | 4099 days | 9% |
Hendrik Schanz | 6/10 | 4105 days | 5% |
Philip Gosemann | 6/10 | 4105 days | 5% |
i davis | 9/10 | 4204 days | 0% |
Fjord | 9/10 | 4402 days | 27% |
Maria Klister | 7/10 | 4402 days | 25% |
Socea | 6/10 | 4402 days | 22% |
Jen | 8/10 | 4418 days | 27% |
Gerard Berote | 8/10 | 4419 days | 27% |
Karine Scheers | 8/10 | 4419 days | 27% |
Petr Dvorak | 8/10 | 4424 days | 27% |
Heinie Pieterse | 10/10 | 4430 days | 28% |
Johannes Knoepfle | 9/10 | 4452 days | 27% |
Joroen Borkert | 8/10 | 4495 days | 27% |
Andrea Wollmann | 9/10 | 4495 days | 27% |
Hanson | 7/10 | 4500 days | 25% |
Anne and John | 9/10 | 4507 days | 27% |
Dio | 9/10 | 4510 days | 27% |
Doan | 10/10 | 4513 days | 28% |
Anja and Katharina | 10/10 | 4517 days | 28% |
maelstrom | 9/10 | 4752 days | 27% |
Trish V | 9/10 | 4765 days | 27% |
Philippe Merino | 8/10 | 4774 days | 27% |
Jill Boruff | 8/10 | 4777 days | 27% |
Robert Steendijk | 7/10 | 4778 days | 25% |
Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 4779 days | 27% |
Tuedi Muggli | 10/10 | 4780 days | 28% |
Hilbert vanEssen | 8/10 | 4780 days | 27% |
Tim Germany | 8/10 | 4783 days | 27% |
Melinda Moir | 8/10 | 4789 days | 27% |
Stephanie Brueck | 8/10 | 4794 days | 27% |
Lyn Deavin | 8/10 | 4795 days | 27% |
Dave Simpson | 10/10 | 4797 days | 28% |
Nico Welagen | 8/10 | 4798 days | 27% |
Jop Veldhuis | 9/10 | 4798 days | 27% |
Tim Gamblen | 9/10 | 4800 days | 27% |
Jurg Pfaendler | 8/10 | 4800 days | 27% |
Steve Goodyear | 10/10 | 4804 days | 28% |
Maria Dietrich | 8/10 | 4807 days | 27% |
Hooked_on_Travel | 1/10 | 4812 days | 3% |
Fred Saunders | 10/10 | 4838 days | 28% |
Graham | 10/10 | 4843 days | 28% |
Rebecca & Hugh Small | 9/10 | 4884 days | 27% |
Wolfgang Goggel | 10/10 | 4888 days | 28% |
Verhahr | 6/10 | 4894 days | 22% |
Winny Yontworst | 8/10 | 4894 days | 27% |
Shira | 10/10 | 5117 days | 28% |
Leroy Dimitri | 10/10 | 5131 days | 28% |
Bob & Yvonne Myles | 7/10 | 5135 days | 25% |
Biau | 7/10 | 5136 days | 25% |
Michael Messuie | 9/10 | 5139 days | 27% |
Juergen Wolf | 10/10 | 5139 days | 28% |
Katherine and Pete Smal | 9/10 | 5139 days | 27% |
Ian & Phyllis | 8/10 | 5141 days | 27% |
Shirley | 10/10 | 5147 days | 28% |
Anita Tonks | 8/10 | 5148 days | 27% |
Jim & Rebecca | 9/10 | 5149 days | 27% |
Waitson | 10/10 | 5150 days | 28% |
Diete Rokosch | 10/10 | 5150 days | 28% |
Verheyen | 10/10 | 5153 days | 28% |
Henrik Mundbuerg | 10/10 | 5153 days | 28% |
Gerlach | 6/10 | 5154 days | 22% |
John Shaw | 7/10 | 5156 days | 25% |
Simon Vallis | 9/10 | 5168 days | 27% |
Samuel Prechel | 6/10 | 5169 days | 22% |
Jochen | 8/10 | 5175 days | 27% |
Fred West | 8/10 | 5176 days | 27% |
Lyndell | 10/10 | 5239 days | 28% |
Siebels Wilke | 9/10 | 5446 days | 27% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5483 days | 28% |
Ian Tainsh | 9/10 | 5496 days | 27% |
johnandgin | 10/10 | 5514 days | 28% |
Herrmann | 8/10 | 5517 days | 27% |
Luisa | 7/10 | 5524 days | 25% |
Mark | 8/10 | 5533 days | 27% |
Don and Barb | 8/10 | 5535 days | 27% |
margaret Klawitter | 8/10 | 5535 days | 27% |
Peter McGain | 8/10 | 5537 days | 27% |
Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5538 days | 28% |
Brenda | 8/10 | 5539 days | 27% |
Mrs Russon | 8/10 | 5539 days | 27% |
parker1 | 8/10 | 5588 days | 27% |
willemrn | 8/10 | 5589 days | 27% |
blokzyl | 9/10 | 5593 days | 27% |
catdonjaime | 10/10 | 5597 days | 28% |
aniekenm | 8/10 | 5598 days | 27% |
Jerry | 7/10 | 5604 days | 25% |
Stefan Lua | 9/10 | 5606 days | 27% |
Peter Essink | 9/10 | 5606 days | 27% |
Lothar Riedmann | 9/10 | 5606 days | 27% |
Susan Marquard | 8/10 | 5608 days | 27% |
Sibylle Locher | 9/10 | 5612 days | 27% |
Susanne Santer | 9/10 | 5612 days | 27% |
Geoff Renshaw | 10/10 | 5615 days | 28% |
Ruth Kinder | 10/10 | 5634 days | 28% |
erikc | 7/10 | 5708 days | 25% |
godineau | 5/10 | 5730 days | 18% |
AndyEngland | 9/10 | 5836 days | 27% |
BouterG | 10/10 | 5844 days | 28% |
Darren Main | 7/10 | 5848 days | 25% |
Sharon | 9/10 | 5848 days | 27% |
Conrad Duden | 10/10 | 5848 days | 28% |
Lauren_D | 8/10 | 5848 days | 27% |
marianneb | 10/10 | 5848 days | 28% |
Nick | 10/10 | 5852 days | 28% |
b_van_reenan | 7/10 | 5854 days | 25% |
yam | 1/10 | 5859 days | 3% |
JimM1 | 10/10 | 5860 days | 28% |
HovingL | 6/10 | 5860 days | 22% |
Sarah_rae | 8/10 | 5864 days | 27% |
MundschanGermany | 8/10 | 5864 days | 27% |
DamienM | 10/10 | 5864 days | 28% |
Silvia | 10/10 | 5864 days | 28% |
E.G | 4/10 | 5867 days | 13% |
Rolf | 4/10 | 5870 days | 13% |
Ed | 7/10 | 5870 days | 25% |
Erik | 6/10 | 5870 days | 22% |
CarolineZ | 6/10 | 5875 days | 22% |
FloorN | 7/10 | 5875 days | 25% |
IM | 6/10 | 5879 days | 22% |
Claudia | 9/10 | 5884 days | 27% |
Klaus | 8/10 | 5884 days | 27% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5887 days | 28% |
NicoleK | 5/10 | 5889 days | 18% |
KonterR | 5/10 | 5889 days | 18% |
ElaineE | 1/10 | 5895 days | 3% |
Tessa | 10/10 | 5898 days | 28% |
Marcus | 9/10 | 5912 days | 27% |
Kerim | 7/10 | 5914 days | 25% |
Hannah | 6/10 | 5914 days | 22% |
William | 9/10 | 5919 days | 27% |
Graham | 10/10 | 5920 days | 28% |
Roberta | 8/10 | 5920 days | 27% |
Henry | 10/10 | 5921 days | 28% |
Daryl | 9/10 | 5921 days | 27% |
Theresa | 10/10 | 5979 days | 28% |
David | 2/10 | 6022 days | 5% |
martina | 10/10 | 6045 days | 28% |
Nynke | 8/10 | 6045 days | 27% |
Jim Summers | 5/10 | 6096 days | 18% |
Martin | 8/10 | 6115 days | 27% |
Anne | 7/10 | 6214 days | 25% |
Annie | 8/10 | 6218 days | 27% |
Heather | 9/10 | 6220 days | 27% |
Dean Field | 10/10 | 6220 days | 28% |
Jeppe Fischer | 7/10 | 6224 days | 25% |
Ovin | 8/10 | 6224 days | 27% |
Camilla | 10/10 | 6224 days | 28% |
Kristin | 10/10 | 6224 days | 28% |
Daniela | 9/10 | 6227 days | 27% |
Thibault | 8/10 | 6227 days | 27% |
Michelle | 8/10 | 6228 days | 27% |
Clifford | 9/10 | 6228 days | 27% |
Klaus Uhl | 10/10 | 6231 days | 28% |
Mariah | 9/10 | 6232 days | 27% |
Sam | 9/10 | 6234 days | 27% |
Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 6234 days | 27% |
Rachael Hawson | 10/10 | 6234 days | 28% |
Bernie | 6/10 | 6234 days | 22% |
Alan Bellerby | 8/10 | 6234 days | 27% |
Terri Williams | 8/10 | 6235 days | 27% |
Jennie Eritsson | 10/10 | 6238 days | 28% |
Tina Daly | 5/10 | 6240 days | 18% |
Naomi Horton | 8/10 | 6241 days | 27% |
Kristine Clemmensen Rotne | 5/10 | 6241 days | 18% |
George Clark | 8/10 | 6245 days | 27% |
Ortved | 8/10 | 6245 days | 27% |
Lisa Tame | 8/10 | 6249 days | 27% |
Charles Price | 8/10 | 6252 days | 27% |
Howie | 7/10 | 6260 days | 25% |
Hanna | 8/10 | 6261 days | 27% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6261 days | 27% |
Stefanie | 9/10 | 6261 days | 27% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6261 days | 27% |
Anne Mainwaring | 2/10 | 6267 days | 5% |
Diane | 8/10 | 6284 days | 27% |
Debbie | 7/10 | 6284 days | 25% |
Wayne Best | 8/10 | 6284 days | 27% |
Assaf Kadury | 9/10 | 6288 days | 27% |
Warren | 7/10 | 6288 days | 25% |
Amy | 8/10 | 6288 days | 27% |
Stephanie | 8/10 | 6289 days | 27% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6290 days | 27% |
Olthof | 8/10 | 6291 days | 27% |
Maruja | 9/10 | 6291 days | 27% |
Hans Olthof | 8/10 | 6291 days | 27% |
Berger | 9/10 | 6295 days | 27% |
Julia | 10/10 | 6295 days | 28% |
Kim and Richard | 8/10 | 6296 days | 27% |
Ad | 7/10 | 6317 days | 25% |
Daphne | 8/10 | 6324 days | 27% |
Linda | 9/10 | 6329 days | 27% |
Frida | 9/10 | 6332 days | 27% |
Matilde | 7/10 | 6338 days | 25% |
Tom Clements | 7/10 | 6338 days | 25% |
Christin | 6/10 | 6338 days | 22% |
Paulina | 6/10 | 6338 days | 22% |
Jane Edgar | 8/10 | 6340 days | 27% |
Wendy Williams | 8/10 | 6340 days | 27% |
Andy | 7/10 | 6535 days | 25% |
FrankOosterwijk | 7/10 | 6535 days | 25% |
Bridgy | 6/10 | 6538 days | 22% |
Caroline | 7/10 | 6554 days | 25% |
Claire | 6/10 | 6564 days | 22% |
George | 9/10 | 6564 days | 27% |
Jennifer | 7/10 | 6564 days | 25% |
suzanna | 8/10 | 6564 days | 27% |
Siobhan | 9/10 | 6564 days | 27% |
Sebastian | 8/10 | 6566 days | 27% |
Elaine | 7/10 | 6569 days | 25% |
Roger&Shirley | 8/10 | 6572 days | 27% |
JairoGarcia | 8/10 | 6577 days | 27% |
Martin | 8/10 | 6577 days | 27% |
Gillian | 7/10 | 6577 days | 25% |
Helene | 8/10 | 6578 days | 27% |
AnnaHerbert | 8/10 | 6584 days | 27% |
Christina | 3/10 | 6584 days | 9% |
Sophie | 7/10 | 6584 days | 25% |
Lisa | 6/10 | 6584 days | 22% |
Pam Rose | 7/10 | 6588 days | 25% |
Rudi | 10/10 | 6602 days | 28% |
Jacobien | 8/10 | 6618 days | 27% |
Lukas | 9/10 | 6624 days | 27% |
Fiona | 10/10 | 6624 days | 28% |
GermanTourGroup | 9/10 | 6626 days | 27% |
Klaus | 8/10 | 6626 days | 27% |
Rolf Kruger | 2/10 | 6626 days | 5% |
Geert | 8/10 | 6628 days | 27% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Wilsons Abel Tasman experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.66% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 61 days. However the Wilsons Abel Tasman experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Wilsons Abel Tasman experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.61% |
198 | -3.63% |
199 | -3.65% |
200 | -3.66% |
201 | -3.68% |
202 | -3.70% |
203 | -3.72% |
… | … |
3.34% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.