Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
246 Valid Reviews
The Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience has a total of 246 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 246 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 67 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 64 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 70 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 34 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
85.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi valid reviews is 85.33% and is based on 246 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
236 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 246 valid reviews, the experience has 236 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 236 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 62 |
|
26% |
9/10 | 62 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 68 |
|
29% |
7/10 | 34 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.34% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi face-to-face reviews is 85.34% and is based on 236 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
86.91%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Lynette Valk | 10/10 | 1343 days | 100% |
Emma | 9/10 | 1737 days | 29% |
JBUSA | 1/10 | 2194 days | 9% |
Isabel Zedelius | 10/10 | 2843 days | 16% |
Barbara Hirsch | 6/10 | 2850 days | 14% |
Colin George | 10/10 | 2892 days | 16% |
Babs Muelink | 8/10 | 2895 days | 15% |
Harry Smit | 8/10 | 2895 days | 15% |
Danny | 9/10 | 2905 days | 15% |
Miriam Gamble | 10/10 | 2940 days | 15% |
Josh Symons | 8/10 | 3176 days | 12% |
Lewis Whittle | 8/10 | 3179 days | 12% |
Max von Felde | 8/10 | 3181 days | 12% |
Gabriel Siibers | 9/10 | 3198 days | 12% |
Stephan | 8/10 | 3240 days | 12% |
Lola | 10/10 | 3868 days | 5% |
Steffen | 9/10 | 3898 days | 5% |
Helma Druyken | 7/10 | 3898 days | 4% |
Austin Johns | 10/10 | 3902 days | 5% |
Johanna Kofler | 9/10 | 3903 days | 5% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 3924 days | 5% |
Mike Majnik | 10/10 | 3924 days | 5% |
Andreas Jung | 8/10 | 3924 days | 4% |
Emilie Chanbon | 8/10 | 3931 days | 4% |
Alexis Redor | 8/10 | 3931 days | 4% |
Petra Kurcova | 8/10 | 3948 days | 4% |
Adam Balcar | 8/10 | 3948 days | 4% |
Elin Paulssen | 10/10 | 3959 days | 4% |
Monique Browne | 10/10 | 3961 days | 4% |
Hendrik Rother | 9/10 | 4256 days | 1% |
Camille Coombes | 6/10 | 4258 days | 1% |
Mathieu Maran | 6/10 | 4258 days | 1% |
Glenn Surzur | 7/10 | 4267 days | 1% |
Caderet | 8/10 | 4267 days | 1% |
Francois Marchar | 7/10 | 4275 days | 1% |
Mo Downes | 8/10 | 4279 days | 1% |
Lagunegrand | 8/10 | 4281 days | 1% |
Pink | 6/10 | 4298 days | 0% |
Nadine and Jan | 7/10 | 4337 days | 0% |
Jason | 7/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
Kohler | 9/10 | 4344 days | 0% |
Annie | 9/10 | 4348 days | 0% |
Frans Derks | 9/10 | 4348 days | 0% |
Simon Rawlinson | 9/10 | 4611 days | 5% |
Sam | 10/10 | 4634 days | 5% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4639 days | 5% |
Inge & Erik | 9/10 | 4640 days | 5% |
Cole | 9/10 | 4641 days | 5% |
Frans Roebroek | 9/10 | 4641 days | 5% |
M H Hansen | 10/10 | 4642 days | 5% |
Nick & Adele Waller | 10/10 | 4642 days | 5% |
Stefes Wencke | 9/10 | 4643 days | 5% |
Peter Holt | 9/10 | 4647 days | 5% |
Nout de Wit | 7/10 | 4651 days | 5% |
Guillaume Milcent | 7/10 | 4656 days | 5% |
J Knol | 8/10 | 4685 days | 5% |
Bradley | 9/10 | 4704 days | 5% |
Sanne Ta Stroete | 8/10 | 4710 days | 5% |
Steve & Maggie | 7/10 | 4722 days | 5% |
Chris & Susanna | 4/10 | 4722 days | 3% |
Moniek Roelots | 8/10 | 4728 days | 5% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 9/10 | 4730 days | 5% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 4730 days | 5% |
Jane Stalker | 8/10 | 4736 days | 5% |
Andreas & Sonja | 7/10 | 4737 days | 5% |
Remco te Lintum | 8/10 | 4737 days | 5% |
Janet Arber | 9/10 | 4946 days | 5% |
Michael Welscheubach | 10/10 | 4947 days | 5% |
Lisa Milton | 10/10 | 4958 days | 5% |
Karsten Tannhauser | 10/10 | 4979 days | 5% |
Lynn | 10/10 | 4984 days | 5% |
Jackie MacRostie | 10/10 | 4986 days | 5% |
Nathalie Verzeletti | 8/10 | 4986 days | 5% |
Jen Fyfe | 7/10 | 4987 days | 5% |
David and Karen | 10/10 | 4988 days | 5% |
Michaela Strohmarer | 10/10 | 4988 days | 5% |
Alan Jeffery | 8/10 | 4992 days | 5% |
Rachel Kent-Lawton | 9/10 | 4996 days | 5% |
Bart & Kim | 10/10 | 4997 days | 5% |
M Holierhoek | 7/10 | 4998 days | 5% |
Mark Irwin | 7/10 | 5007 days | 5% |
Andrew Koster | 8/10 | 5009 days | 5% |
Bernard Gastaud | 9/10 | 5009 days | 5% |
G Elliason | 9/10 | 5010 days | 5% |
Ruben and Jetske | 7/10 | 5014 days | 5% |
Trov & Liz Warren | 10/10 | 5016 days | 5% |
Heike Toepelt | 10/10 | 5016 days | 5% |
Michael Eck | 9/10 | 5017 days | 5% |
Markus Richert | 8/10 | 5018 days | 5% |
Jean-Paul Le Clair | 6/10 | 5018 days | 4% |
Pam de Vos | 8/10 | 5020 days | 5% |
Katherine Bernsdorf | 9/10 | 5020 days | 5% |
Claudia | 10/10 | 5288 days | 5% |
Martina Pankova | 9/10 | 5336 days | 5% |
Kevin F | 9/10 | 5343 days | 5% |
Dwight Odland | 9/10 | 5347 days | 5% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 10/10 | 5347 days | 5% |
Siobhan Lorgena | 8/10 | 5358 days | 5% |
NZ_Nana | 10/10 | 5361 days | 5% |
hughesW | 8/10 | 5361 days | 5% |
Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5362 days | 5% |
Tony Killingray | 8/10 | 5364 days | 5% |
Mark Ashton | 10/10 | 5367 days | 5% |
Senel | 8/10 | 5368 days | 5% |
Haitsma | 7/10 | 5369 days | 5% |
Mark | 9/10 | 5369 days | 5% |
Hans de Rijk | 9/10 | 5371 days | 5% |
Lynn Tichauer | 10/10 | 5372 days | 5% |
Bunnik | 9/10 | 5374 days | 5% |
Eva | 8/10 | 5378 days | 5% |
Brenda Brelinski | 10/10 | 5383 days | 5% |
Fam Schuijers | 8/10 | 5384 days | 5% |
Irene Turley | 9/10 | 5384 days | 5% |
Alex Baxter | 4/10 | 5385 days | 3% |
Groen | 7/10 | 5386 days | 5% |
Mark Marg | 8/10 | 5388 days | 5% |
Yvonne Ing | 9/10 | 5388 days | 5% |
Otto | 7/10 | 5388 days | 5% |
Annette Friskopp | 8/10 | 5389 days | 5% |
Vu Thi Lan | 6/10 | 5406 days | 4% |
marylus | 8/10 | 5435 days | 5% |
elskeb | 7/10 | 5439 days | 5% |
djrogers | 8/10 | 5444 days | 5% |
Jane | 10/10 | 5451 days | 5% |
Seiler | 10/10 | 5453 days | 5% |
mdarras | 7/10 | 5455 days | 5% |
Hanne Wichmann | 10/10 | 5455 days | 5% |
Jansen | 8/10 | 5455 days | 5% |
Hans & Karin | 8/10 | 5455 days | 5% |
Bert Wierzy | 8/10 | 5458 days | 5% |
Gaelle | 8/10 | 5461 days | 5% |
Ricarda | 8/10 | 5461 days | 5% |
Alexis De Wilde | 9/10 | 5461 days | 5% |
Malinka Nuefeld | 9/10 | 5461 days | 5% |
Philip Ryott | 9/10 | 5461 days | 5% |
Vicki Cashmore | 9/10 | 5463 days | 5% |
Flavia Mionelli | 10/10 | 5463 days | 5% |
J Keimel | 8/10 | 5463 days | 5% |
Ana Garcia | 9/10 | 5464 days | 5% |
TomM | 9/10 | 5687 days | 5% |
MorganK | 9/10 | 5687 days | 5% |
YohanM | 8/10 | 5690 days | 5% |
Dirk | 7/10 | 5694 days | 5% |
IanM | 7/10 | 5695 days | 5% |
CornelissenS | 8/10 | 5712 days | 5% |
Fred | 8/10 | 5718 days | 5% |
Wouter Muller | 7/10 | 5718 days | 5% |
Ian | 10/10 | 5718 days | 5% |
Nick | 9/10 | 5723 days | 5% |
Halley | 9/10 | 5725 days | 5% |
Brian | 10/10 | 5725 days | 5% |
StephC | 7/10 | 5728 days | 5% |
RokP | 10/10 | 5728 days | 5% |
NikolaGermany | 8/10 | 5728 days | 5% |
FrankFlemming | 10/10 | 5729 days | 5% |
JoanneM | 8/10 | 5730 days | 5% |
NikkiB1 | 10/10 | 5730 days | 5% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 5731 days | 5% |
Rafael | 7/10 | 5731 days | 5% |
Laura | 10/10 | 5734 days | 5% |
HelenP | 10/10 | 5738 days | 5% |
Trevor | 10/10 | 5738 days | 5% |
John | 9/10 | 5738 days | 5% |
RoseyUK | 8/10 | 5742 days | 5% |
Yunker | 8/10 | 5743 days | 5% |
Christina | 10/10 | 5743 days | 5% |
Kirsty | 7/10 | 5745 days | 5% |
David | 8/10 | 5745 days | 5% |
KuntzGermany | 10/10 | 5750 days | 5% |
Helen | 7/10 | 5759 days | 5% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5759 days | 5% |
Martha | 9/10 | 5762 days | 5% |
Rory | 7/10 | 5763 days | 5% |
LeaM | 10/10 | 5765 days | 5% |
Penwell | 9/10 | 5766 days | 5% |
Thierry | 8/10 | 5767 days | 5% |
Mary | 7/10 | 5768 days | 5% |
Ruben | 7/10 | 5768 days | 5% |
FeliciaO | 10/10 | 5774 days | 5% |
Martin | 7/10 | 5779 days | 5% |
Watermann | 8/10 | 5812 days | 5% |
Julia | 10/10 | 5825 days | 5% |
Mathew | 10/10 | 5829 days | 5% |
RhysandSteffi | 8/10 | 5845 days | 5% |
Kristina | 8/10 | 5869 days | 5% |
garrick | 9/10 | 5884 days | 5% |
Kees | 8/10 | 5919 days | 5% |
Cory Fusco | 9/10 | 5919 days | 5% |
Katie Wise | 10/10 | 5927 days | 5% |
Steffi | 10/10 | 5930 days | 5% |
Kerstin | 8/10 | 5934 days | 5% |
Nikki Gray | 5/10 | 5945 days | 4% |
Salome | 8/10 | 6003 days | 5% |
Liz Brown | 10/10 | 6031 days | 5% |
Erin White | 8/10 | 6058 days | 5% |
Toby | 8/10 | 6067 days | 5% |
Amy Lumsden | 8/10 | 6071 days | 5% |
Rob and Leo | 9/10 | 6072 days | 5% |
Caroline Cole | 9/10 | 6072 days | 5% |
Ellie Koss | 7/10 | 6072 days | 5% |
Omer Harron | 8/10 | 6075 days | 5% |
Maria Fahlander | 8/10 | 6085 days | 5% |
Graham | 7/10 | 6087 days | 5% |
Phil Connelly | 9/10 | 6087 days | 5% |
Anja | 9/10 | 6088 days | 5% |
Trinkler | 9/10 | 6088 days | 5% |
Ohad | 10/10 | 6088 days | 5% |
Kristine | 10/10 | 6092 days | 5% |
Mariska | 8/10 | 6093 days | 5% |
Ralph Schnizer | 10/10 | 6094 days | 5% |
Mike | 10/10 | 6100 days | 5% |
Mark | 9/10 | 6107 days | 5% |
Juerg | 10/10 | 6136 days | 5% |
Evelyn | 9/10 | 6137 days | 5% |
Tanya | 8/10 | 6138 days | 5% |
Andy | 10/10 | 6138 days | 5% |
Roger Mills | 8/10 | 6138 days | 5% |
Tony and Ken | 10/10 | 6142 days | 5% |
Christian Arnot | 10/10 | 6164 days | 5% |
Anita | 10/10 | 6164 days | 5% |
Francesco | 9/10 | 6169 days | 5% |
Alexis | 8/10 | 6169 days | 5% |
Sarah Wilton | 7/10 | 6170 days | 5% |
ranker_46 | 8/10 | 6297 days | 5% |
Stephanie | 10/10 | 6406 days | 5% |
Will | 7/10 | 6411 days | 5% |
Michael | 9/10 | 6418 days | 5% |
sven | 5/10 | 6420 days | 4% |
Adi | 9/10 | 6421 days | 5% |
John | 9/10 | 6428 days | 5% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6431 days | 5% |
Silke | 10/10 | 6432 days | 5% |
Heather | 9/10 | 6432 days | 5% |
Ian | 8/10 | 6449 days | 5% |
Karla | 8/10 | 6454 days | 5% |
Meyer | 9/10 | 6458 days | 5% |
Shirely | 9/10 | 6460 days | 5% |
Andreas | 8/10 | 6461 days | 5% |
Herman&Ineke | 10/10 | 6464 days | 5% |
Jensen | 10/10 | 6465 days | 5% |
Stefan | 7/10 | 6469 days | 5% |
Henrich | 8/10 | 6470 days | 5% |
Frank | 9/10 | 6471 days | 5% |
Deirdre | 9/10 | 6473 days | 5% |
Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6473 days | 5% |
ranker_410 | 9/10 | 6484 days | 5% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.89% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.84% |
198 | -3.86% |
199 | -3.87% |
200 | -3.89% |
201 | -3.91% |
202 | -3.93% |
203 | -3.95% |
… | … |
2.24% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.