Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth

Valid Reviews

52 Valid Reviews

The Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth experience has a total of 53 reviews. There are 52 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 16
31%
9/10 16
31%
8/10 7
13%
7/10 3
6%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 3
6%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 3
6%

80.96% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth valid reviews is 80.96% and is based on 52 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

85.87%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Cn 6/10 167 days 88%
Lotto 10/10 259 days 100%
Kenai 8/10 320 days 96%
Eline 9/10 320 days 97%
Morgane 6/10 379 days 82%
Mladen Savov 10/10 379 days 95%
Ike 5/10 410 days 71%
Simon 9/10 471 days 90%
Milly Struthers 5/10 501 days 67%
Beth 10/10 501 days 89%
Tīwai 9/10 563 days 84%
LuxuryVanDweller 10/10 563 days 85%
Martin 9/10 593 days 82%
can24camp 7/10 685 days 70%
Daph' 10/10 714 days 73%
Andrew 10/10 714 days 73%
Phil K 5/10 714 days 56%
Shelly the Van 10/10 745 days 71%
laura 10/10 745 days 71%
Maren 9/10 776 days 67%
Diana Antunez 9/10 837 days 61%
Marie Perret 9/10 837 days 61%
Apirera 10/10 898 days 55%
Valentin 10/10 898 days 55%
Marine 7/10 898 days 51%
Laura 8/10 959 days 48%
@saltyskin 10/10 959 days 49%
Genevieve 8/10 990 days 45%
Finn 9/10 990 days 45%
Ruohan Li 10/10 1020 days 43%
sarah penney 10/10 1020 days 43%
Louisa Runge 9/10 1079 days 37%
Linc 10/10 1232 days 25%
Drew 8/10 1324 days 18%
George 4/10 1416 days 8%
Ko 6/10 1416 days 12%
Wayne 8/10 1416 days 13%
Melanie 7/10 1659 days 5%
Bex 9/10 1871 days 4%
Boardwalk Blss 9/10 2024 days 3%
Wanderingphoenix 9/10 2024 days 3%
Mathieu 1/10 2146 days 0%
Gracjan 1/10 2175 days 0%
Dave Kitson 10/10 2206 days 3%
Eva Muselaers 9/10 2206 days 3%
Luna 8/10 2206 days 3%
Tassie Travellers 9/10 2267 days 3%
Dona Shiell 8/10 2451 days 2%
Julie 1/10 2481 days 0%
Andy and Julia 9/10 2511 days 2%
Elad 10/10 2512 days 2%
Keybags 9/10 2540 days 2%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.66% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

88%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.