Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth

Valid Reviews

52 Valid Reviews

The Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth experience has a total of 53 reviews. There are 52 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 16
31%
9/10 16
31%
8/10 7
13%
7/10 3
6%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 3
6%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 3
6%

80.96% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth valid reviews is 80.96% and is based on 52 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

85.76%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Cn 6/10 222 days 89%
Lotto 10/10 314 days 100%
Kenai 8/10 375 days 95%
Eline 9/10 375 days 96%
Morgane 6/10 434 days 81%
Mladen Savov 10/10 434 days 94%
Ike 5/10 465 days 70%
Simon 9/10 526 days 88%
Milly Struthers 5/10 556 days 66%
Beth 10/10 556 days 87%
Tīwai 9/10 618 days 82%
LuxuryVanDweller 10/10 618 days 83%
Martin 9/10 648 days 79%
can24camp 7/10 740 days 67%
Daph' 10/10 769 days 70%
Andrew 10/10 769 days 70%
Phil K 5/10 769 days 53%
Shelly the Van 10/10 800 days 67%
laura 10/10 800 days 67%
Maren 9/10 831 days 63%
Diana Antunez 9/10 892 days 57%
Marie Perret 9/10 892 days 57%
Apirera 10/10 953 days 50%
Valentin 10/10 953 days 50%
Marine 7/10 953 days 47%
Laura 8/10 1014 days 43%
@saltyskin 10/10 1014 days 44%
Genevieve 8/10 1045 days 40%
Finn 9/10 1045 days 41%
Ruohan Li 10/10 1075 days 38%
sarah penney 10/10 1075 days 38%
Louisa Runge 9/10 1134 days 33%
Linc 10/10 1287 days 22%
Drew 8/10 1379 days 16%
George 4/10 1471 days 7%
Ko 6/10 1471 days 10%
Wayne 8/10 1471 days 11%
Melanie 7/10 1714 days 4%
Bex 9/10 1926 days 4%
Boardwalk Blss 9/10 2079 days 3%
Wanderingphoenix 9/10 2079 days 3%
Mathieu 1/10 2201 days 0%
Gracjan 1/10 2230 days 0%
Dave Kitson 10/10 2261 days 3%
Eva Muselaers 9/10 2261 days 3%
Luna 8/10 2261 days 3%
Tassie Travellers 9/10 2322 days 3%
Dona Shiell 8/10 2506 days 2%
Julie 1/10 2536 days 0%
Andy and Julia 9/10 2566 days 2%
Elad 10/10 2567 days 2%
Keybags 9/10 2595 days 2%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.68% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

87%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.